by Kurt HaskellWith jury selection set to begin in the Underwear Bomber Trial set to  begin tomorrow, I've spent the evening reminiscing about Christmas Day  2009 and the 21 months since. The Underwear Bomber attack has  fundamentally changed my life. Not in the way most would think, but it  has destroyed any faith I've had in the U.S. Government, the media and  this country as a whole. To say that I believe the government is corrupt  and the media is complicit doesn't fully explain my beliefs. Not only  have I come to those conclusions, but I've witnessed that an ordinary  person who sees something important can be silenced despite his efforts  to spread the truth. Such is the Underwear Bomber case. I can do nothing  but laugh at the TSA's new policy of "If you see something say  something." That is exactly what I did, and not only did the U.S.  Government not want to hear what I had to say, but it actively lied  about it, attempted to get me to change my story, and hid, by  withholding (secret government) evidence or putting a protective order  on the evidence and nearly everything that would support my eyewitness  account.
Where are we now? We now have The Underwear Bomber (Umar) representing  himself with the help of standby attorney Chambers. Attorney Chambers  has indicated to me that if he were Umar's attorney, that the defense  would be entrapment and that I would be a key witness. Of course, such a  defense would expose the U.S. Government's involvement in the plot. It  is much too convenient to have Umar represent himself and be in charge  of what the defense will be, what evidence is presented, what witnesses  are called and what questions each witness is asked. A trial with Umar  representing himself will leave the relevant facts of this case unknown  for generations. I can't help but think that Umar fired his attorneys  for a reason other than he is a crazy terrorist. It is much too  convenient that the entity that staged the event, also controls the  evidence, what information is leaked to the media, who the prosecutors  are, and the prison where Umar has sbeen staying at for the last 21  months. Let's not overlook the fact that the U.S. Government has  admitted to waterboarding and torturing terrorists. Do you see the  pieces of the puzzle forming a clear picture yet?
Make no mistake that Umar did in fact attempt to detonate a device  (although it was a defective device) on Flight 253. He is not innocent.  It remains to be discovered whether my belief that Umar is complicit  with the "theatre" going on before our eyes came about before or after  the event of Christmas Day 2009. It really is not important except that  you must understand that he is now complicit in covering up the true  story of Christmas Day 2009. There is no other explanation as to why  Umar is representing himself and rejecting the entrapment defense (Which  I have discovered he will do).
For those that are still skeptical of my claims, please realize that I  do not make my claims without a great deal of thought and research. My  firm belief is that Umar was escorted around security and given an  intentionally defective bomb by a U.S. intelligence agent. The bomb was  never intended to detonate, but merely intended to create a "simulated  terrorist attack" or a "false flag attack" if you will. In December of  2009, the U.S. Government hadn't seen a terrorist attack in 8 years, It  was getting more and more difficult to spend hundreds of billions a year  on terrorism and to continue to fight two fraudulent wars based on  terrorism. Those making their livings off of the war on terror didn't  want to lose their cash cow. Enter Umar the Underwear Bomber. A second  benefit of a failed bomb being found in Umar's underwear, was to enable  body scanning machines to be placed in every airport. How convenient for  Michael Chertoff , a former head of the DHS, to have ties to the body  scanning companies. I doubt that this was any coincidence. Once again,  billions of dollars would flow from the U.S. Government for body  scanning machines that were needed to protect us.
What we are now left with are the bits and pieces of the Underwear  Bomber case that can form a clear picture of what happened that day. For  those of you attempting to put it all together, please take your time  and think about the evidence instead of glossing over it and continuing  to remain in denial. The truth is that your U.S. Government staged a  false terrorist attack in order to steal your tax dollars and your 4th  Amendment Rights to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures.  Please thoroughly consider the following with an open mind and think  about why this sort of behavior must stop now:
My thoughts on this case and the list of anomalies that differ from the  official version of events were made through: (a) numerous discussions  with other passengers, (b) my own eyewitness account, (c) discussions  with Umar's standby attorney, (d) hundreds of articles on the story (e)  evidence provided to me by others "in the know" or just other concerned  citizens, and (f) from the official record at hearings I attended.
Anomalies of the case in no particular order:
1. In December 2010, Chambers told the Detroit Free Press that the  Government's own explosives experts indicate that the bomb was  impossibly defective. The Free Press later erased this article from its  online site, but did not erase earlier underwear bomber stories.
2. The FBI has admitted to supplying the Portland Christmas Tree Bomber  and the Wrigley Field Bomber with intentionally defective bombs shortly  after the underwear bomber event.
3. Janet Napolitano's comment that "the system worked" was a Freudian  slip.
4. The plane taxied to the gate. The passengers were not allowed off of  the plane for 20-30 minutes (Was the bomb still on the plane?). There  was bomb material that was supposedly explosive all over the cabin of  the plane. Nobody took any action to make sure the passengers were safe  or that the "explosives" were of no danger to the passengers. This is  evidence of foreknowledge that there was no danger to the passengers.
5. TSA admitted knowledge of the threat while the flight was over  Canada/Atlantic Ocean. No measures were taken to notify the pilot or to  divert the flight for an emergency landing elsewhere.
6. My eyewitness account of the sharp dressed man and the related  evidence as to this man. There is no other likely explanation for this  man except for government involvement. The airport video has never been  released and remains under protective order of the court.
7. The government's continued release of Umar's passport picture through  the media. This was done for no other reason that to attempt to  discredit me. Why such an effort to show a passport picture all over the  media? In no other case has a passport picture been shown in the media.  A copy of the supposed "passport" of Umar, however, was not released to  Chambers until June 2011. The release of the passport to standby  defense counsel was delayed 19 months in order to limit the amount of  time Chambers would need to have experts verify its authenticity.
8. The explanation for the cameraman is near unbelieveable. He started  filming the sky just before the attack started and then he turned to  film the entire attack from beginning to end. We all thought we were  going to die. The last thing on anyone's mind at that time was to film  something.
9. On 1-5-10 Breibart posted an article that indicated the Government  had viewed over 200 hours of video from the airport and it showed no  evidence of an accomplice. This article is contradicted by the 1-22-10  article of ABC News by Brian Ross that indicated that "The government is  looking into the identity of a man that helped Umar at Schiphol." The  article fails to mention that this "sharp dressed man" escorted Umar  through security without a passpot and instead tries to paint this man  as Al Qaeda. The government is contradicting itself in both of these  stories and is attemptin weak coverups in each story.
10. Umar is charged with conspiracy. The accomplices names or  contributions are never mentioned. They are not listed as wanted and  they are never discussed. This is because they are U.S. Intelligence  agents.
11. Customs spokeperson Ron Smith changed the official story about the  2nd man taken into custody in Detroit 5 times. Then he sent a half  hearted apoogetic email to the media. My story as to this man has never  changed. Ron Smith eventually gave up lying and quit talking about this  man who was witnessed by nearly all of the passengers.
12. Why were pictures of Umar's underwear constantly released to the  media? These pictures show Umar's underwear is largely intact. I have  information from a credible source that due to this incident, Umar "Will  never have any kids". This fact is not in line with undamaged  underwear. The continued release of the underwear was used as a  propaganda piece to reinforce the deceit.
13. The prosecution has continued to block evidence from Umar's standby  attorney and in some cases, has provided it late. Why? If Umar was a  terrorist nut, what is it that the government does not want the defense  to see? It seems to me that if the official story is true, then this is  an open and shut case. It appears that the government feels a need to  insulate itself from civil cases filed by the passengers.
14. Why has Chambers repeatedly indicated that Umar has a very valid  defense? The answer is the entrapment defense.
15. Portions of the Patriot Act were set to expire just before Christmas  Day 2009. The Congressional vote to extend them was delayed until  February. Body scanning machines were already built and sitting in  warehouses. Michael Chertoff, the former head of the Department of  Homeland Security has ties to the body scanning manufacturers. The U.S.  had no terrorist attacks from 2001 until Christmas Day 2009. A new  terrorist attack was needed to get the body scanning machines in the  airports.
16. If flight 253 had crashed, nobody would know that the bomb was in  Umar's underwear. An unsuccesful staged attack was necessary to show  where the bomb was held. This was needed to sell the American public  that body scanners were needed to prevent similar future attacks.
17. The story of Umar obtaining his bomb in another country and wearing  it to Schiphol is not logical. It is much more likely that he was given  the defective bomb at or near the airport. It is likely that the second  man taken into custody in Detroit gave him the bomb at Schiphol. My  theory is that the bomb sniffing dog (which we witnessed) in Detroit  sniffed bomb residue in his bag after we landed.
18. Umar could have been stopped in Amsterdam after boarding and been  charged with various charges that would have resulted in a life  sentence. Instead he was allowed to fly into U.S. airspace and light his  bomb there, over Detroit, on Christmas Day in order to make this a MUCH  large media story to usher in the body scanners.
19. How did Umar pick his window seat over the gas tank when he paid  cash for his ticket? (You must buy your ticket with credit in order to  pick your seat).
20. Other terrorist attack videos are released within hours. The  relevant video in this case has never been released. Note that Schiphol  airport has more cameras than any airport in the world.
21. The bomb was lit in the cabin and not in the bathroom so that it  could be filmed and make more of a media event than a dud bomb lit in a  bathroom.
22. Obama's "failed to connect the dots speech" is discredited by the  Congressional testimony of Patrick Kennedy of the State Department.  Kennedy indicated that, in so many words, that the government was  tracking Umar and did not revoke his visa in order to track him into the  U.S. This is almost, but not quite an admission that he was let into  the U.S. on purpose.
23. The Congressional testimony of Michael Leiter indicated that the  U.S. Government frequently lets terrorists into the U.S.
24. In early 2010, a Mr. Wolf appeared on the Keith Olberman Show and  indicated that the Obama administration was looking into the possibility  that this was an intentional plot by a U.S. intelligence agency.
25. Watch the Congressional testimony of Patrick Kennedy (available on  the internet) and watch how he does vocabulary gymnastics to avoid  saying that this was an intentional plot by U.S. intelligence.
26. Dutch military police initially indicated that Umar did not go  through normal security measures. This was only reported once.
27. Why did a passenger call me in early January 2010 and attempt to  convince me that I did not see Umar being escorted around security, but I  instead witnessed a minor child being taken through security. This was  untrue. I later found out that such passenger works for a contractor  that receives a great deal of business from the Department of Defense.
28. Why does the mainstream media continue to not investigate this story  and continue to not report my eyewitness account?
29. A second passenger contacted me and confirmed my acount of the Sharp  Dressed Man. She is scared and refuses to come forward.
30. Why have nearly all of the passengers refused to talk about this  case?
31. Why were a great deal of the passengers, military personnel,  government workers and government contractors?
32. Why did the prosecution indicate at a recent hearing that it was  still withholding some evidence that was deemed to be secret (top  seret?). What could be so secret if the government was not involved in  the plot?
33. Why has the online Detroit Free Press site erased all underwear  bomber articles that support my theory on the case, but retained older  articles that support the official story?
It is unfortunate that the upcoming trial will be nothing but a farce  and deceitful theatre to imbed lies in the minds of the sheeple.