The World's Deadliest Table And Why It Must Be Destroyed

Wiki image

Scott Oliver, Contributing Writer
Activist Post

Is the world's deadliest table made of glass? Of wood, metal, plastic, bamboo or some high-tech composite material?

Does it have three legs, four, six or more? Or, is it one of those massive tables that seats dozens of people?

Is the table in the kitchen? The dining room? In a secure office conference room somewhere? Or, do they all meet at the same table in a MacDonalds restaurant every once in a while?

Where is this bloody table anyway?

1. US Senator Kerry knows where it is: Asked whether using force was a possibility in Iran, the Democratic lawmaker told reporters: "I don't think anything should be taken off the table at this point in time."
2. Obama refers to the table frequently: In terms of a response to the alleged Iranian plot, "we don't take any options off the table," which is a government euphemism for considerations of military attack.
3. Obama also stated that: "Yes. I think that a nuclear armed Iran is not just a threat to us, it's a threat to Israel. And it is a game changer in the region. It's unacceptable. And that's why I've said that I won't take any options off the table, including military, to prevent them from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
4. "The continued presence of all options on the table". In his interview with CBS news, American President Barack Obama refused to rule out the possibility of a military strike against Iran.
5. When Mr. Bush was asked if his administration was planning for the possibility of a nuclear strike against Iranian nuclear facilities, he said that: "All options are on the table."
6. Dick Cheney too, the brave U.S. politician who received five deferments to avoid serving his country during the Vietnam war... "But I've also made the point, and the president has made the point, that all options are on the table," he said, appearing to leave open the possibility of military action.
7. Cheney on Iran, March 7, 2006: "For our part, the United States is keeping all options on the table in addressing the irresponsible conduct of the regime," Cheney said in a speech to his owners at the pro-Israel lobby group, the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee.
8. In an article encouraging Obama to prosecute Donald Rumsfeld for War Crimes it was declared that: "The evidence against Rumsfeld has been on the table for years now."
9. Bush was also referring to the table in March 13, 2002: "And so one of the -- what the Vice President is doing is he's reminding people about this danger, and that we need to work in concert to confront this danger. Again, all options are on the table, and -- but one thing I will not allow is a nation such as Iraq to threaten our very future by developing weapons of mass destruction."
10. The man picked by President Bush to run the Pentagon Robert Gates also made it clear that "all options are on the table". When asked if he believed the US was winning, he replied flatly: "No, sir."
11. When pressed on whether the Syrian situation is a diplomatic challenge or a military one, Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage said that "all options are obviously on the table."
12. In a reference to the White House's battle to depose Libya's leader, Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, Lobbyist, R. Bruce Josten said, "To quote what they say every day on Libya, all options are on the table."
13. Bush said: "He [Saddam] told the world that he would show us that he would not develop weapons of mass destruction and yet over the past decade he has refused to do so. And the Prime Minister and I both agree that he needs to prove that he isn't developing weapons of mass destruction. I explained to the Prime Minister that the policy of my government is the removal of Saddam and that all options are on the table."
14. Hillary Clinton, in Foreign Affairs: "Iran must conform to its nonproliferation obligations and must not be permitted to build or acquire nuclear weapons. If Iran does not comply with its own commitments and the will of the international community, all options must remain on the table."
15. During a press conference in Baghdad, Gen. John Abizaid said "all options are on the table..,"
16. In an article about the Israelis secret service involvement in the Iran plot, Michigan Representative Mike Rogers said that: "I don't think you should take it off the table."
17. U.S. Senator John McCain who is now promoting military intervention in Syria says: "The United States should be willing to put all aspects of our policy on the table..."

Based on the public statements from some of the world's most respected mass murderers, I think we can all agree that the evidence against this table is overwhelming and it's clear that this is one extremely deadly table...

Since it's primarily U.S. politicians that are referring to this table - no European politicians that I know of are putting anything on or, are taking anything off the table - it would appear that the table must be physically located somewhere within the borders of the U.S.

And high powered politicians in the U.S. continue put things on and off this table like there was no tomorrow.

Well there is a tomorrow and I'd like to propose that we destroy (or perhaps recycle?) this table before the U.S. invades Syria to "protect civilians " or for "humanitarian" reasons.

This table is a willing accomplice in numerous deadly and often genocidal conflicts and with your help and support, we can put an end to this insane warmongering once and for all.

Now, can someone please confirm exactly where we can find the world's deadliest table?

Scott Oliver is founder of WeLoveCostaRica.com and author of How To Buy Costa Rica Real Estate Without Losing Your Camisa, Costa Rica Real Estate Scams & How To Avoid Them, and Costa Rica's Guide To Making Money Offshore.

It's Official: Col Muammar Gaddafi Is In Zimbabwe

It official; Col Muammar Gaddafi is now a guest of Zimbabwean despot Robert Mugabe in Harare, but activists of the Movement for Democratic Change, the MDC Veterans Activists Association (VAA) have called on Zimbabweans to storm the house in the Gunhill suburb of Harare to effect a mass citizens' arrest.

In a statement today the VAA said Gaddafi staged a nocturnal entry into Zimbabwe aboard a Zimbabwe Air force jet that landed at Suri-Suri Airbase in Chegutu at 01:07am on Wednesday morning.

“He was quickly whisked to a sprawling mansion in Harare’s Gunhill suburb under the cover of darkness with members of MDC VAA in a secret pursuit.

“We kept a hawk’s eye on the house since Wednesday until this morning (Friday) and we don’t doubt even for a second that the fallen despot is now a ‘unique guest’ to Robert Mugabe.

"The house is encircled by uniformed army personnel of the Zimbabwe National Army and is swarming with plain clothes policemen and dreaded CIO operatives.”

They said all indications were confirming what they saw, including heavily armed female blonde body guards of Libyan origin patrolling around the house where the former despot is holed up.

Gaddafi and his female bodyguards

They also have clear video footages to back our claims. The suspicious female imposters in military attire are patrolling the vicinity with fingers on the trigger.

There has been a hive of activities since the arrival of Gaddafi in the Gunhill house as luxurious government vehicles speed in and out of ‘brother leader’s new compound’.

All roads passing near the house were blocked since Wednesday morning, literally slapping the neighbor with a curfew.

MDC VAA National Chairman Solomon Sox Chikohwero said they were giving Gaddafi a week to leave Zimbabwe from today (Friday).

“This country is not a haven for dictators. We have two so far, who we cannot afford even for one day, and the third one is obviously an additional encumber to our burden.

“If he fails to do so we shall be storming t hat house in our thousands and effect a mass citizen arrest and hand him over to the ICC (International Criminal Court) in Hague.

“No sane Zimbabwe security personnel will arrest or shoot us in defense of a dejected and rejected dictator,” he said.







Written by Makusha Mugabe

Public Spectacle of Gaddafi's Death Signal for Expanded War?

by Staff Report

Hillary Clinton

Killing Gaddafi not such a good idea after all ... The greatest punishment for the Libyan dictator would have been incarceration and humiliation ... The late Libyan leader may have been rotten through, not to mention bordering on mad, but his barbaric execution doesn't bode well for Libya's future. The whole point of a revolution is change; hopefully change for the better. – Gulf News

Dominant Social Theme: The butcher of Libya is dead. "We came, we saw, he died," said Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Free-Market Analysis: Perhaps the most disturbing element of the death of Muammar Gaddafi was its public spectacle. So many shaky videos of the 60-year-old straggly-haired Gaddafi being punched, shoved, bloodied and even "sodomized" have emerged that we long ago gave up keeping track.

Why is the deliberate public spectacle of Gaddafi's death and Hillary's triumphant reaction to it (see today's video) more important than the deliberate destabilization of Libya itself and the deaths of thousands of innocents? Because it seems to us – as elite meme watchers – that the Anglosphere power elite is setting us up for increased violence the world over, maybe a radical, terrible expansion. We covered this in several articles yesterday: "Obama's Re-Election Model Is FDR" and "NATO Preps for World War?"

We have generally noticed the coarsening of the public dialogue over the past decades. People are routinely referred to now as "perverts" and the use of this pejorative dehumanizes the individual and makes it much easier for the state to impose whatever damages it chooses. This supports such travesties of justice as when adults were accused of molesting toddlers in Massachusetts and incarcerated on trumped-up charges. There are many other instances. Labels dehumanize and make injustice tolerable and even celebrated.

As regards this sort of rhetoric, the biggest change we have noticed, currently anyway, is in the way that the Anglosphere treats its enemies. There was once, in the 20th century, a good deal of vituperation aimed at the USSR and its top men, with justification. But in the past decade or so the same sort of rhetoric has been aimed at Islam and at small-time Middle Eastern dictators.

While no doubt leaders like Saddam Hussein and Gaddafi were terrible to certain people in their country, the remedies have seemingly proven far more destructive than anything done by these two. Iraq was shattered by a nearly decade-long war. Libya's main cities have been shattered in a much shorter time period, mostly by a tremendous rain of NATO bombs.

This article, excerpted above, is one of the few we have read that provides a more balanced view of what just happened in Libya. There is no doubt that Gaddafi could be a merciless foe who meted out inhumane punishments to those who opposed him. But he also provided Libya with what was ultimately a high living standard for the Middle East and Africa, and as dictators go he was not nearly so bad as other rulers that the US and NATO has backed with enthusiasm. Here's some more from the article:

Summary executions, torture and beatings were the way Gaddafi and his brood handled their foes, which is why the Libyan people have rightly rejected the weird man and his cruel, egotistical, bigspending clan ... Gaddafi's capture was supposed to signify a new day, a new dawn; an era of democracy and the rule of law. The National Transitional Council (NTC) wants Libya to take its rightful place within the international community sans the stench of the rogue state the country once was.

Frankly, it was sickening to watch the footage of Gaddafi, bloodied and dazed, being hauled off the bonnet of a vehicle before being dragged through the streets, clearly very much alive if not very well. As the video proves, he was then bundled into an ambulance en route to Misrata and was seen to be fully conscious. From there on the picture becomes murky. Initial reports from the NTC indicated that he was caught in the crossfire when a bullet entered his head, inside an ambulance! Forensic experts say he was executed at close range.

It's worrying that one of the NTC's senior members, Mohammad Sayeh, said, "Even if he was killed intentionally, I think he deserves this." He should be setting an example. It's one thing for fighters to take revenge in the atmosphere of war and quite another for a political figure to bless such barbarity ... By resorting to the same low methods as your enemy you risk becoming the very enemy you're battling.

These are good points, we think, though we disagree with the idea that Gaddafi should have been tried by an international court. The only reason he wasn't probably was because he knew a good deal too much about Western leaders and the way the world really works. Gaddafi is dead now and that knowledge died with him.

The Libyan "war" was evidently waged for several reasons, and probably had to do with oil and with ensuring that Gaddafi did not begin to use gold rather than dollars as the main currency for Libyan oil. Additionally Gaddafi was trying to set up an African Union that would use its own currency and oppose the West on numerous economic and socio-political issues.

The biggest reason from our point of view may be that the West is secretly working to set up an Islamic crescent of countries in the Middle East and Africa that may provide a pretext for war. Most of the countries that the West is destabilizing will end up with Islamic rulership to some degree, or so it seems. Libya is no exception.

It seems to us that there may be war on the horizon – big war – and Western citizens are now to be desensitized to it, and to the enemies of the West generally. This has happened with such Western enemies as the USSR – the "Red Menace" and the German "Huns," the Japanese "Nips" and the Vietnamese "Gooks. "

Gaddafi death videos are still circulating on the Internet, each one more gruesome and graphic than the last. These videos circulate throughout the world – and especially throughout the Anglosphere at a time when YouTube denies viewers the sight of a breast or female nipple because it might cause offense. Such images are stashed behind a firewall.

Conclusion: But when it comes to videos of Gaddafi being killed or assaulted with blood dripping down his face, we have a full menu of gory items to choose from. We can watch all we want. The images circulate unimpeded. The US Secretary of State laughs and releases her celebratory clip for all the world to see. What does this portend?

Murdoch Lies Fill The News Again

Hi Tap,

I found an interesting article by Dick Eastman on Gaddafi. The front page of the Sun is yet another example of Murdoch's lies and (illegal) warmongering.

Visitors to the Tap will know that propaganda is the stock in trade of the British mass media. They know that Gaddafi had nothing to do with Lockerbie, or the killing of Yvonne Fletcher, or the East Berlin disco bombing. These were all NATO/Mossad black ops, as you can find out from the detailed documentaries and books that have appeared, but which are forgotten by the BBC. And when Gaddafi gave money to the IRA, he was paying for protection by shouldering MI6's expenses. Lord James has already stated publicly that he managed the finances of the IRA for years. In fact, as you will see from the following, Gaddafi was a lot better than Cameron or Blair. He wasn't a warmonger for a start. Unlike Cameron and Blair, he didn't send his army and air force on humanitarian missions that caused bloodbaths and destroyed infrastructure. It turns out he wasn't even a liar, until he accepted the blame for Lockerbie, which he had nothing to do with.

Unlike Cameron and Blair, he wasn't a coward either. When the mighty NATO war machine hit Libya, Gaddafi didn't try to escape, he led the fighting from Tripoli, where his three grandchildren were killed, and after that from his home town. After US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's public announcement that she wanted Gaddafi 'dead or alive', he was of course executed, using the 'double tap', a bullet in the torso and another in the head - a standard NATO extra-judicial execution technique. So all the official 'concerns' about the execution of Gaddafi are bogus. It doesn't matter who pulled the trigger, he was executed to avoid embarrassing revelations at his trial in the Hague.

Gaddafi also did a lot for his country - unlike Britain's useless politicians who for decades have taken their orders from behind the scenes and get us into endless debt, while always finding reasons for not doing what the public wants. I was surprised to see what a good 'tyrant' Gaddafi was. As you will see from the following, he would have won a British general election hands down.

The Amazing Things Moammar Gaddafi Did For Libya
By Dick Eastman

1. There is no electricity bill in Libya; electricity is free for all its citizens.

2. There is no interest on loans, banks in Libya are state-owned and loans given to all its citizens at 0% interest by law.

3. A home is considered a human right in Libya ­ Gaddafi vowed that his parents would not get a house until everyone in Libya had a home. Gaddafi’s father has died while he, his wife and his mother are still living in a tent.

4. All newlyweds in Libya receive $60,000 Dinar (US$50,000) by the government to buy their first apartment so as to help start up the family.

5. Education and medical treatments are free in Libya. Before Gaddafi only 25% of Libyans were literate. Today the figure is 83%.

6. Should Libyans want to take up farming career, they would receive farming land, a farm house, equipment, seeds and livestock to kick-start their farms ­ all for free.

7. If Libyans cannot find the education or medical facilities they need in Libya, the government funds them to go abroad for it ­ not only free but they get US$2,300/mth accommodation and car allowance.

8. In Libya, if a Libyan buys a car, the government subsidizes 50% of the price.

9. The price of petrol in Libya is $0.14 per liter.

10. Libya has no external debt and its reserves amount to $150 billion ­ now frozen globally.

11. If a Libyan is unable to get employment after graduation the state pays the average salary of the profession as if he or she is employed until employment is found.

12. A portion of Libyan oil sales is credited directly to the bank accounts of all Libyan citizens.

13. A mother who gives birth to a child receive US$5,000

14. 40 loaves of bread in Libya costs $ 0.15

15. 25% of Libyans have a university degree

16. Gaddafi carried out the world’s largest irrigation project, known as the Great Man-Made River project, to make water readily available throughout the desert country.

Which other dictator has done so much good for his people?

All that is of course finished. The Libyans are now facing grinding poverty and the introduction of a Rothschild system of taxation along with cultural engineering levered by Harmanesque programmes provided by brainwashed western 'experts'. Of course, that will come after the years of costly and bloody ethnic war that are now beginning. That will provide further opportunities to squeeze out Libya's wealth.

Clearly Gaddafi was setting a very bad example to the international community. He was in the process of pulling the whole of Africa out of the clutches of the bankers.
Gaddafi refused to do the bidding of the Rothschild-centered global banking cartel in 5 areas:

· A Gaddafi-Centered African Union With A Common Currency (The Rothschilds love to create money out of nothing and lend it to governments)
· A Gaddafi-Run Central Bank Of Libya (The Rothschilds love central banks)
· A Gaddafi-Holding Of 150 Tons Of Gold (The Rothschilds love gold)
· A Gaddafi-Run Libyan Oil Industry (The Rothschilds love oil)
· A Gaddafi-Run ‘Blue-Gold’ Water Reserves (The Rothschilds love water)

Best Regards,

Gordon Logan.

Libya - We came, we saw, we kicked its ass!

‘High-class terrorists running US, UK and France’

“We are seeing how Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State expressed it very clearly: ‘We came, we saw, he died,’ and then started laughing. This is a message to the world of how this new world order model actually works,” (Argentinian economist Adrian Salbuchi) stated.

“When they decide to change the regime, they do so with the utmost violence, and it is a whole model. First they target a country by calling it a rogue state; then they support local terrorists and call them freedom fighters; then they bring death and destruction upon civilians and they call it UN sanctions. Then they spread lies and call it the International Community’s opinion expressed by the Western media. Then they invade and control the country and call it liberation and finally they steal appetizing oil and call it foreign investment and reconstruction,” Salbuchi explained, having lived through the late-2001 Argentinian bank run and financial collapse.




Proof positive that all congressional business is run like a cheap Hollywood movie.

"We came, we saw, we kicked its ass," is what Dr Peter Venkman uttered in Ghostbusters, once Zool was sent back to whichever parallel plane that spawned it.

Am I right in thinking ALL THESE WARS IN THE MIDDLE EAST, all these sovereign invasions by foreign NATO forces, were cynical attempts to HIDE THE EVIDENCE OF CORPORATE COLLUSION in activities such as 9-11, 7-7, Lockerbie, Cuba, the IRA and Arms Sales To Tyrants For Oil or Mineral Assets and you know, Lord of War-like shenanigins the world over?

Are the violent decades following September 11th 2001 going to be known as THE CLEAN-UP YEARS?

Posted by Mike Philbin

GADDAFI IS ALIVE; NOT DEAD

The YouTube video of the 'Gaddafi capture'

The Gaddafi video seems to have been made BEFORE Gaddafi was allegedly captured.

Green Resistance Libyan Free Press



In the Gaddafi video, note the jerky camera and the bad focus.

The CIA was criticised for having no video footage of the fake shooting of Bin Laden.

So now they have video of the fake death of Gaddafi - jerky to make it seem authentic (too jerky) and bad focus to stop us seeing any Hollywood effects (very bad focus).

The BBC told us this was Libyans celebrating; in fact it was Indians in India.

Photo of the capture of an actor.

Reportedly, Gaddafi is still alive and the Green Resistance continues.

It would seem that the CIA and its friends have produced yet another piece of fake news when they tell us that Gaddafi has been killed.

Green Resistance sites deny that Gaddafi has been captured or killed.

MUAMMAR AL GADDAFI IS ALIVE AND IS STILL LEADING THE LIBYAN RESISTANCE

Original Picture of unknown man at the so called Bin Laden compound


FAKE photoshopped picture of 'dead Gaddafi'. Note the green patch.



There has been a disinformation campaign from the media to spread the lie that Gaddafi is dead.

Libye – Seul le porte parole Moussa Ibrahim est au courant de l'état de Kadhafi (20 octobre 2011)

The media outlets which have told the truth have been subjected to attack.

"Connection problems"

Libye – Notre site ALGERIA ISP a été victime d'attaques (20 octobre 2011)

The CIA's news outlets are responsible for the lies.

Libye – CNT/OTAN/ELJAZZERA/ELARABIYA annonce 3 mensonges : La mort de Kadhafi, son fils Moatassem et son ministre de la défense

Gaddafi is in excellent health.

Libye – Le guide Kadhafi est toujours vivant et il dit TOZ FI CNT/OTAN (20 octobre 2011)

Gaddafi on 9 11

Where is the real Saddam?

GADDAFI, SADDAM AND THE CIA

Many thanks to C for various links.

Gaddafi. An Alternative View From An Ex-British Spy.

This is what I've written on Gaddafi.

Gaddafi is dead according to the BBC, which tends to lie in its teeth on important political matters. The BBC viewers and
listeners have already written upwards of 500 comments on Gaddafi's death, most of them as ignorant as the stuff that the BBC
has been feeding them all their lives. The comments on the BBC website are full of references to Lockerbie and the shooting of
Yvonne Fletcher, both of which were NATO black ops - like the 9/11 and 7/7 atrocities - committed to keep the Israelis and the
Rothschilds happy. Gaddafi had nothing to do with the notorious East Berlin disco bombing either, which was the work of Mossad.

We are now well into the Orwellian age of huge lies, which it is fair to say began in 1984 with the shooting of Policewoman
Fletcher and MI6's farcical attempt to get the IRA to kill Mrs. Thatcher at Brighton. A gaggle of freemasons, led by the
paedophile Willie Whitelaw, scurried in their dressing gowns to the Grand Hotel to view Mrs Thatcher's corpse and were horrified
to see the obstinate 'Iron Lady' walk out of the rubble covered in brick dust.

Fittingly in the Orwellian world, MI6's attempts to kill Gaddafi - later proved by Shayler and a leaked CX document - persuaded
the Colonel to see reason and take the blame for the crimes that his very accusers had committed. That is realpolitiik. Understand
it, because that is the way the world works. That he was financing the IRA at a time when it was being used by MI6 and
Whitelaw to kill the British Prime Minister, indicates that Gaddafi was forced into behind the scenes compromises. He also
agreed to harbour the notorious international terrorist Abu Nidal, who turned out to be a Mossad agent.

In fact, Gadaffi was a hero who lived for much of his life under the threat of death because he preferred not to listen to the
'international community'. Libya was not a country where the international bankers' writ was allowed to run. He even wrote a
'Green Book', which was a blueprint for life without international bankers. Unlike the British government, Libya had a lot of money in the bank and no external debts. The Libyan banks handed out interest free loans in accordance with sharia law. Libyans were sheltered from the international energy scam and had access to very
cheap electricity and petrol. Water, formerly rare in Libya, was provided by a remarkable underground river that Gaddafi built
from the Sahara aquifers.

Unfortunately, it took an obstinate and courageous dictator to ensure these unusual privileges. A lesser
man would, like David Cameron and his predecessors, have got his country into debt, racked up energy prices and sent their
soldiers off to the Iraq and Afghanistan butcheries. As it was, Gaddafi was forced to put up with many attempts to kill him by
NATO sponsored terrorists like the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group of Abdel 'Hack 'em' Belhadj.

After taking delivery of Belhadj from the Americans and torturing him at the request of the 'international community', the tyrant
allowed him and the other terrorists out of prison in 2010, after they had signed undertakings to go home and behave
themselves. Instead they went home and took delivery of large consignments of weapons that NATO had smuggled over the
Egyptian border and proceeded to mount a putsch in Benghazi under NATO air cover. The Tyrant's mistake was that he didn't
keep the terrorists in prison or shoot them, which is what they did to him yesterday and will no doubt do to the rest of his family,
following the example of David Cameron, who killed three of Gaddafi's grandchildren in April.

Best regards,

Gordon

TAP

Thanks for that, Gordon. I wonder if the newsroom end of Gaddafi means the next war is starting, just as the newsroom end of Osama Bin Laden meant the start of Libya. Alex Jones on infowars.com thinks Iran is game on from here.

'Gaddafi dead' story stinks? 'Skepticism over NATO & NTC reports'

Uploaded by RussiaToday on 20 Oct 2011

For latest updates, follow RT on http://twitter.com/RT_com and http://www.facebook.com/RTnews

Libya government officials say Colonel Gaddafi has been killed. The news comes from the city of Sirte, which has reportedly been overrun by government forces. Officials first said Gaddafi had been taken alive, with serious injuries to both his legs. The latest we're hearing from the National Transitional Council is that the Colonel has died from his wounds. One of Gaddafi's sons has also reportedly just been killed in Sirte. The NTC had said the fall of Sirte would spell the liberation of Libya, after nine months of civil war.

Wadah Khanfar, Al Jazeera and the triumph of televised propaganda

by Thierry Meyssan

Al-Jazeera - the Qatari news channel that in the space of 15 years established itself in the Arab world as an innovative news outlet - suddenly embarked in a vast intoxication campaign to overthrow the regimes of Libya and Syria through any means. As demonstrated by Thierry Meyssan, this was not a conjunctural shift but one that was planned long in advance by individuals who shrewdly concealed their personal interests to the public. Revelations follow ...

Wadah Khanfar

The Qatari-based Al-Jazeera channel announced the resignation of its director general, Wadah Khanfar, and his replacement by a member of the royal family, Sheikh Hamad Ben Jassem Al-Thani on September 20, 2011.

Sheikh Hamad is a Qatargas executive, and spent a year at the head office of Total in Paris. He is the former chairman of the Al-Jazeera Board of Directors.

This development is protrayed by the Atlanticist media in three different ways: either as a forced resignation and a takeover of the channel by the State, as a revenge on the part of the Palestinian Authority following the release of the Palestinian Papers and, finally, as the result of the Wikileaks leak exposing some of the connections between Mr. Khanfar and the United States.

While each of these interpretations may contain some truth, they nevertheless obscure the overriding factor: the role of Qatar in the war against Libya. At this point, a flash backwards is called for.

...MORE HERE...

What future for Al-Jazeera?

The conversion of Al-Jazeera into a propaganda tool for the recolonisation of Libya was not achieved without the knowledge of the emir of Qatar, but indeed under his leadership. The Gulf Cooperation Council was the first to call for an armed intervention in Libya and Qatar was the first Arab country to join the Contact Group. He funneled weapons to the Libyan "rebels" before sending in his own ground troops, especially during the Battle of Tripoli. In exchange, he obtained the privilege of controlling all the oil trade on behalf of the National Transitional Council.

It is too early to say whether the resignation of Wadah Khanfar marks the end of his mission in Qatar, or if it heralds the channel’s desire to recover the credibility that took 15 years to build and only 6 months to lose.

Thierry Meyssan

Lockerbie and Libya (and Heroin)

Cartoon by Martin Rowson

On 26 September 2011, the media reported that prosecutors in Scotland asked the new Libyan leadership for its help with the Lockerbie bombing inquiry.

Scotland's Lord Advocate Frank Mulholland QC asked the Libyan authorities to hand over any information that could lead to a second trial over the bombing, which killed 270 people in December 1988.

The Crown Office sought assistance from Libya's National Transitional Council (NTC) to gain evidence that could lead to the conviction of others involved in the atrocity.

A spokesman said that "In particular we have asked the NTC to make available to the Crown any documentary evidence and witnesses which could assist in the ongoing inquiries."



The following is the documentary evidence now provided:

Top Secret

1. "CIA assets in Germany, with ties to the PFLP-GC, made the Lockerbie bomb." (LOCKERBIE IS ABOUT HEROIN)

2. A document dated 18 July 2007 (The Lumpert Affidavit) signed by Ulrich Lumpert, employed as electronic engineer at MeBo from 1978 to 1994, reads:

'I confirm today on July 18th 2007, that I stole the third hand-manufactured MST-13 Timer PC-Board consisting of 8 layers of fiberglass from MEBO Ltd. and gave it without permission on June 22nd 1989 to a person officially investigating in the Lockerbie case"

3. A retired Scottish Police Chief has given sworn testimony that the evidence in the Lockerbie trial was planted by CIA operatives.

4. LOCKERBIE IS ABOUT HEROIN

ITV Exposure - Propaganda FAIL!

Ruaidhrí O' Conghaile, Contributing Writer
Activist Post

A source at the British Secret Intelligence Service, MI6, has claimed that deposed Libyan leader, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, was funding armed Irish dissident republican groups in the north of Ireland as recently as June 2011.

The claim featured as part of an exclusive ITV1 documentary entitled, 'Exposure: Gaddafi and the I.R.A', which aired on September 26th.

The MI6 source alleges that a Libyan government courier flew into London earlier this year with $2 million in cash during a stopover on route to the Irish Republic. The money is thought to have been on its way to an Irish businessman closely associated with one of the armed dissident republican groups.

ad

At present, there are three armed dissident groups active in the north of Ireland, Óglaigh na hÉireann, the Continuity Irish Republican Army (C.I.R.A) and the Real Irish Republican Army (R.I.R.A). The program did not specify as to which group the money was to be allocated.

The MI6 source was also unable to confirm whether or not the money had in fact reached its destination.

Colonel Gaddafi's support for Irish unity has long been documented. Expressing his opinion on the situation in Ireland, Gaddafi once famously said, "We believe the cause of Ireland is a just cause, and we support this just cause, because we believe Ireland is Ireland and Britain is Britain, and the existence of Britain in the north of Ireland is a sense of colonisation."

The former Libyan leader supported the Provisional I.R.A campaign to varying degrees from the early 1970's through to the signing of the Good Friday Agreement in 1998, lending both financial support and substantial arms shipments to aid the Irish campaign.

The programme also obtained a copy of a video, purportedly showing an Irish dissident training camp taking place in the rural Irish countryside. Dissidents appeared to be armed with AK47 automatic rifles and pistols.

Armed insurgency is again on the rise in the north of Ireland, and there has been a steady increase in the number of attacks over the last several years.

During his decades in power, Gaddafi is believed to have funded several armed resistance groups across the world, these include the Palestinian Liberation Organisation, the Black September movement, the Moro Islamic Liberation Front in the Philippines, and the Japanese Red Army.

Determining the validity of the recent claim featured in the ITV documentary may prove difficult however. MI6 declined to officially confirm its authenticity.

I feel it is also important to draw attention to a number of blatant and rather worrying factual inaccuracies in the documentary. Shockingly, C.G.I footage from a popular computer game entitled 'Arma 2' was depicted in the program as having been a real life incident involving the I.R.A. On top of that, old television footage of street clashes between Irish nationalists and the R.U.C, the former police force in the north of Ireland that were disbanded in the year 2000, was described by the programs narrator as having occurred "earlier this year".



This shows that the standard of research behind the documentary was completely below what one would expect from a broadcaster of the caliber of ITV.

The program had quite a heavy political slant throughout, and was anything but impartial. In the sixty minutes dedicated to highlighting the evil of Gaddafi's role in sponsoring the Provisional I.R.A, there was not one single mention of the role the British government and British security forces played in sponsoring and colluding with Loyalist paramilitaries in the north of Ireland. Several reports and official inquiries have confirmed that the British state played an active role in sponsoring many violent atrocities in Ireland. To draw attention to Gaddafi's role, without so much as even mentioning the fact that the British state did the very same thing, highlights the politically biased nature of the documentary.

My own personal opinion is that the program seemed more concerned with manipulating public opinion in regards to the current situation in Libya.

There was also a strong sense of irony towards the end of the program as a member of the Libyan Transitional Council lambasted the use of violence to overthrow repressive regimes.

It remains to be seen whether or not the claim that Colonel Gaddafi has again resumed his support for Irish dissidents is true. Given the history of the situation, it is certainly not beyond the realms of possibility. The poorly researched nature and obvious political agenda of the documentary, will however, lead many to question its overall validity.


Ruaidhrí O' Conghaile is an independent Irish Republican, political activist and blogger based in the west of Ireland. You can read more of his work at Dord Fian

Channel 4 - Dispatches - The Wonderful World of Tony Blair

Channel 4's Dispatches, god bless them, ventures into the middle east in search of 'dirt' on ex-UK prime minister Tony Blair, middle east peace envoy and JP Morgan middle east corporate deal maker.

In recent light of nearly 3,000 redundancies at BAE Systems who were implicated in the Saudi bribe probe and played a major role in the no-fly-zone over Libya, Dispatches explores the (obvious) possibility that no-WMD Iraq-invader Blair's pro-USA pro-Israeli dual role in the middle east constitutes a CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

Channel 4 - Dispatches - The Wonderful World of Tony Blair <<- click to watch. Posted by Mike Philbin

NOT THE TEN O'CLOCK NEWS???

While NATO pulverises the Libyan people in the name of freedom for the Libyan people, our subservient media paints a picture of peace loving rebel fighters running around the country freeing their fellow citizens. The method they use to free them is to sit back and wait until NATO blasts the hell out of them and then rush in all guns blazing. If that doesn't work, then they lay siege to the town or city, starve it of food, water and medical supplies, after which they will ask NATO to go back in and terrorise the citizens with a massive bombardment from the air. Thus, Western style freedom crawls its bloody way through Libya.

What is vomited from the mainstream media has no relation to the truth as it is happening on the ground in that unfortunate country. What is happening is tribal faction killings, looting and ethnic cleansing of towns and cities across Libya, aided and abetted by NATO and its paymasters. The following is a short extract from BEFORE IT'S NEWS. It is well worth reading the whole article. You certainly will not get the information on the Ten O'clock News.

---- Despite desperate attempts by Wall Street and London to proclaim their intervention in Libya a success, even going as far as sending their political proxies Nicolas Sarkozy of France and David Cameron of the United Kingdom for a quick photo opportunity at the rebel held airport in contested Tripoli, vast swaths of the nation are still fiercely resisting NATO and their proxy rebel forces. This includes entire cities still standing in defiance against rebel attempts to "starve them out" and dozens of daily NATO airstrikes (NATO report for September 22) aimed at breaking the population's will to fight on.

Weeks ago, the rebel forces, led by US State Department and UK Home Office listed terrorists from the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), a subsidiary of Al Qaeda, boldly announced plans to starve out cities resisting their unelected, foreign backed seizure of the North African nation. The London Telegraph reported in an article aptly titled, "Libya crisis: Rebel leaders hoping to starve Gaddafi stronghold of Sirte into submission," that under the cover of heavy NATO bombing rebel leaders hoped "to starve Col Gaddafi's home town of Sirte into submission, laying siege to his last remaining stronghold in an attempt to avoid mass bloodshed, according to the man spearheading efforts for a peaceful takeover."

A NATO PEACE MISSION!!

Fox News would relay an AP report on September 2, 2011, that rebel commanders declared, "we want to save our fighters and not lose a single one in battles with Qaddafi's forces. In the end, we will get Sirte, even if we have to cut water and electricity and let NATO pound it with airstrikes." AP cited Mohammed al-Rajali, a spokesman for the rebel leadership in the eastern city of Benghazi. Ironically, the article was titled, "UN Warns Libya is Short of Water, Fuel, Medicine," a crisis admittedly being caused by the premeditated denial for entire cities of critical supplies for their civilian populations, enabled by NATO bombing and under the cover of UN recognition of the terrorist rebels - a move that has soundly resigned the UN's legitimacy and stated purpose to the scrapheap of history. ___ READ THE WHOLE ARTICLE.

ann arky's home.

Sarkozy & Cameron Cozy Up with Al-CIAda

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
September 15, 2011

British PM David Cameron and French president Nicolas Sarkozy arrived in Tripoli, Libya, on Thursday and have pledged to provide military, political and economic support to al-Qaeda.

The New York Times, however, does not mention the fact al-Qaeda is part of Libya’s new leadership. The newspaper instead concentrates on “jubilant Libyans praising [Cameron and Sarkozy's] role in pushing the erstwhile Libyan dictator out of formal power,” while saying nothing about the price average Libyans had to pay.

Sarkozy and Cameron said NATO airstrikes will continue so long as Libyans resist the invasion of their country by the global elite. They made the comments during a news conference with al-Qaeda:

They were speaking at a news conference alongside Mustafa Abdel-Jalil, the leader of the interim administration set up by the insurgents, and Mahmoud Jibril, the rebels’ de facto prime minister, who said the rebels still needed NATO “protection for our civilians.”

Jalil is from the Haribi tribe in northeastern Libya. It is linked to al-Qaeda. Many of the CIA’s assets in Afghanistan during the war against the Soviet Union were from Libya and they would later merge with al-Qaeda. Ayman al-Zawahiri gave the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) his personal seal of approval and the LIFG officially joined the group in 2007. A West Point study revealed the intimacy between Libyans and al-Qaeda in Iraq allegedly responsible for killing U.S. occupation troops.

Behind Abdel-Jalil and Mahmoud Jibril stands Abdelhakim Belhaj, the founder of LIFG. “Hardly by accident, all the top military rebel commanders are LIFG,” writes Pepe Escobar. Belhaj, a dedicated al-Qaeda jihadist, is considered the top Libyan military commander.

“This was your revolution, not our revolution,” Cameron told al-Qaeda.

The New York Times and the rest of the establishment media are working overtime to portray the Transitional National Council and al-Qaeda as heroes and the legitimate rulers of Libya. Precious little corporate media space is squandered on the fact NATO’s rebels are murderous racists.

Cameron and Sarkozy did not arrive in Tripoli merely to heap praise on al-Qaeda – they paid a visit in order to promote business: the business of the bankers and transnational corporations.

The trip, according to the New York Times, “was also part of a high-stakes play by both leaders to cast themselves as successful and muscular champions of democracy as their business elites vie for opportunity in post-Qaddafi Libya.”

The globalists prefer that their captured dominion be ruled over by austere and violent Sunni Wahhabists or other wide-eyed fanatics, as was the case in Afghanistan before the U.S. decided to invade the country and overthrow their former partners, the CIA and ISI created Taliban.

The U.S. State Department saw “nothing objectionable” when the Taliban took over the country in the mid-1990s after the Soviets fled.

“The Taliban will probably develop like the Saudis. There will be Aramco [the consortium of oil companies that controlled Saudi oil], pipelines, an emir, no parliament and lots of Sharia law. We can live with that,” a U.S. diplomat said in 1997.

Like al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, the variant in Libya will likely become another enemy in short order and we will be told billions of dollars more must be squandered – and more women and children butchered – lest the evil ones plot against freedom lovers.

YVONNE FLETCHER MURDERED BY OUR SPOOKS

In 1984, in London, Police Constable Yvonne Fletcher was shot dead outside the Libyan people’s Bureau.

In April 1996, Britain's Channel Four programme Dispatches revealed that Fletcher had been murdered by elements of British and American intelligence.

"The purpose of the slaying ... was to 'shape' public opinion and, importantly, pre-empt Parliamentary indignation for the later bombing of Tripoli by British based US warplanes." (Easy Target)

Yvonne Fletcher

The official inquest concluded that WPC Fletcher was killed by someone firing a 9mm calibre automatic weapon from a lower floor in the Libyan embassy.

But this verdict has been disputed by a number of experts, including the British Army's senior ballistics officer Lieutenant Colonel George Styles and Home Office pathologist Hugh Thomas.

Enserch House 'linked to the CIA'

On 24 June 1997, Tam Dalyell MP questioned Prime Minister Tony Blair about the death of Yvonne Fletcher. Dalyell made particular reference to a Channel 4 documentary about the murder:

"With the agreement of Queenie Fletcher, her mother, I raised with the Home Office the three remarkable programmes that were made by Fulcrum, and their producer, Richard Bellfield, called Murder In St. James's.

"Television speculation is one thing, but this was rather more than that, because on film was George Styles, the senior ballistics officer in the British Army, who said that, as a ballistics expert, he believed that the WPC could not have been killed from the second floor of the Libyan embassy, as was suggested.

"Also on film was my friend, Hugh Thomas, who talked about the angles at which bullets could enter bodies, and the position of those bodies.

"Hugh Thomas was, for years, the consultant surgeon of the Royal Victoria hospital in Belfast, and I suspect he knows more about bullets entering bodies than anybody else in Britain.

"Above that was Professor Bernard Knight, who, on and off, has been the Home Office pathologist for 25 years.

"When Bernard Knight gives evidence on film that the official explanation could not be, it is time for an investigation."


A major issue is the discrepancy in the bullet trajectory noted by the pathologist who examined the body of Yvonne Fletcher.

Dr. Ian West wrote in his initial post mortem report she was shot from the upper floors of an adjacent building because "the angle of wound was between 60 and 70 degrees".



Inisto writes:

"Peter Power (involved in the London Tube Bombngs exercise) was deputy forward coordinator/commander at the Libyan People's Bureau siege at which WPC Yvonne Fletcher was shot and killed, in 1984."

More info on Power's involvement is here."

Note also that Dr Paul Knapman was the coroner at the Inquest of Yvonne Fletcher.

"Knapman (as the Westminster coroner) was also involved in the 7/7 incident.

"Stinks, doesn't it?!"

Examination of the scientific evidence showed that the shot which killed Yvonne Fletcher could only have come from from Enserch House.

This building had links to the CIA.

TERMINAL VELOCITY - Deep Black Lies

http://vialls.homestead.com/yvonnefletcher.html

Libya Truth (DnB Soundtrack)

Uploaded by pimpdarlin on 27 Aug 2011

Credits for the music:
Memory Lane by Netsky
Memory Lane vs Happiness Happening from Mash Up Mix 2010 by The Cut Up Boys

Some of what I have found out about Libya & Muammar Al Qaddafi since the brutal, illegal invasion of Libya by Rothschild owned NATO forces.

I ask all reading this to do whatever they can to oppose the New World Order, NATO, the UN & our corrupt politicians.

Please read Qaddafi's Green Book. Download link:

http://911-truth.net/other-books/Muammar-Qaddafi-Green-Book-Eng.pdf

The draft UN report on human rights in Libya before the NATO bombings & invasion.

http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/16session/A-HRC-16-15.pdf

Thank you to all people seeking the truth. You inspire me...

BBC EPIC FAIL!!!

BUSTED AGAIN!: INCREDIBLE FAKE MASS MEDIA FOOTAGE: BBC Shows “Green Square, Libya” FROM INDIA!

WhatReallyHappened.com
24 August 2011

Remember “Wag The Dog?” This is FLAG The Dog!

At about 50 seconds into the above video, you see the supposed Libyan National Transitional Council celebrating in the Green Square, and waving flags!

Here is a single frame from the above.

Note the flag they are waving, with the light colored center? That is the flag of INDIA! (And the people in the crowd look Indian!)

THIS is the flag of the National Transitional Council, recognized by the US as the “legitimate” government of Libya (even though they are not elected).

It looks like BBC couldn’t find any celebrating Libyans, so they used an old shot of celebrating Indians and bet that we were too stupid to notice, just like they bet we were too stupid to notice when BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Center building 7 before it actually happened!

Source:

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com

Libya: Prostitution of Western journalism

Sergey Balmasov
Pravda.Ru
24^th August 2011

The last two days have once again proved the obvious fact that there are no independent media and that Western news agencies, newspapers and magazines work out a political order. The lion’s share of newspapers, magazines and news agencies reported the unprecedented success of the insurgents and predicted the imminent fall of Tripoli.

However, as reported to Pravda.Ru by Libyan Armed Forces captain Hasan D., “Tripoli is still in our hands. When early reports of the assault and landing of the enemy emerged, our leader Muammar Gaddafi arrived wearing his military uniform, and his appearance caused unprecedented enthusiasm among the soldiers and the people. He ordered us to beat the rats and their Western backers. By the morning we partially drove them out of the city, partially destroyed, despite the fact that NATO aircraft are almost constantly hanging in the air, bombing residential neighborhoods. Hospitals are overwhelmed with the wounded. The West is committing a heinous crime, murdering women and children. According to the information received, approximately two thousand civilians were killed. We were able to shot down a helicopter that crashed off the coast. Now the military and militias are killing off the “rats” and foreign fighters on the outskirts of Tripoli.

So what has happened? Some of the foreign newsmen were quick to announce that Gaddafi’s security lay down their arms, the rebels already control 80-90 percent of the city and that they are about to take the bunker where the Colonel is hiding, and that the rebels took Breguet.

They also spread information that people took to the streets of the capital to celebrate the overthrow of the Libyan colonel. As early as in the morning of August 22 the media began reporting on the detention of Gaddafi’s three sons (including Mohammad and Seyifa), as well as the death of Khamis, a commander of the elite brigade. However, none of these prisoners were shown to the public.

Then, the Internet showed the shots of the killed Jamahiriya leaders: Colonel himself, his close associates and relatives, including General Abdullah al-Senussi and Dr Aisha al-Qadhafi. However, very quickly it became clear that this is a lie and there images were fabricated using Photoshop.

For example, the image of the “corpse” of Gaddafi was based on a snapshot of the murdered Secretary of bin Laden, and the “remains” of Aisha materialized on the basis of the photographs of Benazir Bhutto deceased in the terrorist attack.

By the evening it became clear that the insurgents and foreign promoters were running into difficulties. First, the success of Gaddafi opponents stopped at seizing 80-90 percent of Tripoli, and channels like “Al-Jazeera” were broadcasting information about “fierce resistance” of the Colonel’s security that “miraculously” revived.

Later sources have sadly reported that Mohammed fled. Following this, Seyif surrounded by his soldiers appeared in front of the audience and angrily denounced NATO and the rebels, calling on the Libyan people “to destroy the rats.” Then Khamis appeared, whose arrival decisively changed the situation with the defense of the city.

Contradictory information came from Breguet. Western propagandists have reported that Mutassima group came from there to help Gaddafi that the city has surrendered. This information was immediately followed by the reports that, in fact, negated the former. According to the number of media outlets, the battle of Breguet went on. The latter seems to be true, because even if they wanted to, they would not be able to overcome a thousand miles to Tripoli with the opposition of NATO hanging in the air.

By the morning of August 23, even the Western media began to report that the progress of the rebels has stalled. This was accompanied by the speech of Muammar Gaddafi son’s Seyifa, in which he urged journalists to visit all areas of Tripoli and see that everything is quiet in the capital and that the “rats are beaten”, as people continue to hunt down those who escaped during the assault.

But what about the television broadcast of “the popular rejoicing” in the streets of Tripoli? Western journalists are encouraged to broadcast “from the field” showing how people who got rid of the tyrant are rejoicing and sending text messages and videos on the Internet. This could not but confuse some knowledgeable people. First, the Internet access has been an issue in Tripoli since February. Second, the coverage of the “places of events” was filmed against a background filled with electric light areas, while due to damage by bombing power supply in most areas of Tripoli was lacking.

Later, some bloggers have compared the photo from the “places of events” with the photographs of the town and found a strange discrepancy with the well-known paintings of the urban landscape. The urban landscapes are missing very important details such as lanterns light, bas-reliefs on the buildings, trees, etc.

A week ago, Qatari authorities were preparing decorations strikingly similar to the scenes of Tripoli. The meaning of these preparations remained unclear, although it was mentioned that it was necessary to train those who will storm the Libyan capital. With a high probability we can assume that the scene “of capturing the dictator’s lair” was filmed in the Qatari “theater.”

The question arises: why do we need this circus? First, in order to break the faithful and inspire the troops of the rebels. Second, the scenes with the “democrats” who rushed into the Libyan capital were to be a signal of NATO to help them disembark the marines.

In any case, the incident cast another shadow on the foreign journalism. Can one trust such media? In the West journalism has long been considered “the second oldest” profession. But is this comparison true? At the very least, a client that communicates with representatives of the first oldest profession can at least hope for some fun.

Sergey Balmasov
Pravda.Ru

Read the original in Russian

Libya: NATO Psy-Op Collapses - Qaddafi Prevails Again

NATO bluff called by Qaddafi; rebels' victory facade crumbles.

Tony Cartalucci, Contributing Writer
Activist Post

Update: You can't make this up - the International Criminal Court (ICC) now claims it never confirmed that Qaddafi's son Saif Al-Islam was captured. Here is the Telegraph article quoting ICC prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo as having indeed confirmed his capture. Here is a farcical Reuters report now claiming such a confirmation was never claimed. ICC prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo should resign, so should editors at both the Telegraph and Reuters and a myriad of other media agencies complicit in spreading this willful and malicious propaganda.

August 23, 2011 - Once again a defiant Qaddafi has prevailed against the full might of NATO aggression including a murderous bombing campaign followed by NATO special forces on the ground supporting mobs of US/UK/French/Qatari backed Al Qaeda thugs which swarmed Tripoli over the weekend. "Illustrious" news agencies from the Qatari government's AlJazeera, to the now exposed frauds at CNN, BBC, Reuters, AP, AFP have been caught perpetuating a concerted war propaganda campaign in order to break the will of both Libya and in particular Tripoli.

Photo: Taken overnight, Qaddafi's son Saif Al-Islam "confirmed" to be captured and ready to be transferred to the Hague by the illegitimate International Criminal Court, is actually very much free and leading efforts to drive out NATO backed Al Qaeda thugs from Tripoli.


Reports that Qaddafi's son Saif Al-Islam was "captured" by Libyan rebels by the disingenuous media outlets and "confirmed" by the Fortune 500 contrived International Criminal Court (ICC), who went as far as saying preparations were already under way to transfer Saif to the Hague, are now confirmed lies with Saif Al-Islam very much free, appearing to journalists at the Rixos Hotel in southern Tripoli flanked by Libyan military forces and very much leading what appears to be a significant Libyan government counterattack. It appears that NATO operations are ending just as they began, based on a verified pack of lies. (Please see March's "Libya: Another War, Another Pack of Lies")

Everything we have been told, from President Obama's teleprompter readings to Luis Moreno-Ocampo of the ICC's claims of Saif's "confirmed" capture, to the mainstream media and the Al Qaeda infested "Transitional National Council" are now systematically being exposed as overt, verified lies as part of what may be the biggest psychological operation in modern history. Al Jazeera who was already featuring lofty "The Last Days of Gaddafi" narratives is now forced to face reality and irrefutable evidence that the rebel operations in Tripoli were clearly over-hyped war propaganda and the reality is Qaddafi and the Libyan people have called NATO's bluff.

To illustrate just how absurd the Western media has become as their lies break upon the rocks of reality, a recent farcical attempt to save face regarding Saif's appearance before journalists at the Riox included an Al Jazeera report claiming that rebel leaders had confirmation Saif al-Islam was arrested "but have no idea how he escaped." To help out the media it might be suggested that Saif was never captured in the first place and that reports of his arrest were simply a ploy to embolden rebels and make it appear as if the momentum had swung in favor of NATO. (For more on US State Department lies rehashed through "media" please see: "Libyan Rebels Lying Left and Right")

Image: Here, the International Criminal Court "confirms" the now verified lie that Saif Al-Islam was being held by rebels. ICC prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo, in a fit of unmitigated lies claimed, "we have confidential information from different sources that we have within Libya confirming this." He would continue, "it is very important to make clear there is an obligation to surrender Saif to the ICC in accordance with the Security Council resolution." Along with UN Chief Ban Ki-Moon's claim that the "international community" is obligated to comply to the ICC we see unfolding a criminal organization of liars and degenerates of unprecedented proportions.

....

What follows next is unsure. With Council on Foreign Relations president Richard Haas and others calling for an expedient landing of NATO occupation forces it seems they above all others knew just how tenuous the rebels' hold on Tripoli was. As explained previously, the war in Libya goes beyond pilfering the nation's material wealth, it is about establishing the Wall Street-London international order and its primacy over the nation-state. A NATO failure in Libya would infinitely complicate planned operations against Syria, Iran, and along Russia and China's peripheries. While it appears that NATO's last ditch murder spree has failed, with so much on the table, everything from continuous carpet bombing to a NATO land invasion under the guise of UN "peace monitors" or Haas' NATO occupation forces are possibilities already being planned.

What we do know is how desperate the corporate-financier elite are and how absolute their control is over the mainstream media. Such a large, wide scale disinformation campaign is only possible if each news agency, from AP, Reuters, BBC, Guardian, Telegraph, New York Times, CNN, Al Jazeera and others, are completely compromised by corporate-financier interests. The following lists shows that indeed many of these "news agencies" share consortium memberships with some of the largest corporate-financier interests on earth presenting an immense conflict of interest obviously producing astronomically duplicitous improprieties.

Council on Foreign Relations
Chatham House (Major Corporate Members)
Chatham House (Corporate Members)
Chatham House (Corporate Partners)
Brookings Institution (page 20 of Annual Report)

When we see Reuters sitting side-by-side oil giants like BP, Exxon, Chevron within the halls of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Chatham House and then see reports gloating over Western oil companies moving in to replace Chinese and Russian investments in Libya, their duplicity and lack of independence in their reporting becomes glaringly obvious. These media organizations are in fact PR fronts for the Fortune 500 and their collective goal of implementing a global empire, nation to nation. For now, they are currently obsessed over Libya and the implications its conclusion will have on their future planned conquests, the next being Syria.

It would be a good idea for those following the current NATO murder spree in Libya to abandon any trust in Reuters, BBC, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC, ABC, and any of the "reputable" newspapers wasting paper and space on our nations' newsstands, all of whose fates are tied directly to the corporate-financier interests pinning their hopes on a NATO victory in Libya. Instead, we must commit ourselves to vetting reliable alternative news sources as well as committing ourselves to the responsible of researching the news of the day on our own. Let this be proof positive as to how essential it is to boycott and replace everything eminating from the Fortune 500 including their army of professional liars also known as the "mainstream media."

For more information on Libya, please read through the Libya Archives.

Tony Cartalucci's articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own at
Land Destroyer Report.