Photo: November 2007 – THE spectacle of the queen in a long evening dress and diamond-laden crown holding forth in a plummy monotone about “unclaimed money in dormant bank accounts” and other supposedly urgent legislative topics is unsettling enough. But anyone watching the queen unveil the government’s legislative agenda at the State Opening of Parliament here in Britain last week, where that very scene took place, would have noticed something even more jarring. There was the lord chancellor, Jack Straw — former socialist, former head of the radical National Union of Students — reverting to the old obsequious tradition of walking down the steps of the throne backward away from the queen, so as not to turn his back on her.
By Ron Logan
April 2011
The following is taken from The official website of The British Monarchy:
“Coronation Oath, 2 June 1953
In the Coronation ceremony of 2 June 1953, one of the highlights was when The Queen made her Coronation Oath (taken from the Order of Service for the Coronation).
The Queen having returned to her Chair, (her Majesty having already on Tuesday, the 4th day of November, 1952, in the presence of the two Houses of Parliament, made and signed the Declaration prescribed by Act of Parliament), the Archbishop standing before her shall administer the Coronation Oath, first asking the Queen,
Madam, is your Majesty willing to take the Oath?
And the Queen answering,
I am willing.
The Archbishop shall minister these questions; and The Queen, having a book in her hands, shall answer each question severally as follows:
Archbishop. Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Pakistan, and Ceylon, and of your Possessions and the other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs?
Queen. I solemnly promise so to do.
Archbishop. Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements?
Queen. I will.
Archbishop. Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel? Will you to the utmost of your power maintain in the United Kingdom the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law? Will you maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England, and the doctrine, worship, discipline, and government thereof, as by law established in England? And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and to the Churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges, as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them?
Queen. All this I promise to do.
Then the Queen arising out of her Chair, supported as before, the Sword of State being carried before her, shall go to the Altar, and make her solemn Oath in the sight of all the people to observe the premisses: laying her right hand upon the Holy Gospel in the great Bible (which was before carried in the procession and is now brought from the Altar by the Arch-bishop, and tendered to her as she kneels upon the steps), and saying these words:
The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep. So help me God.
Then the Queen shall kiss the Book and sign the Oath.
The Queen having thus taken her Oath shall return again to her Chair, and the Bible shall be delivered to the Dean of Westminster.”
[Taken from The official website of The British Monarchy]
The ‘British Constitution Group’ makes the following observation concerning the oath taken by Queen Elizabeth II at her coronation ceremony:
“Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, whose position has been usurped by a corrupt House of Commons and who has been forced into the destruction of her Kingdom and the breaking of her coronation oath, no longer governs us in accordance with our laws and customs, as was the situation when she was elected by the people as our Sovereign and our Head of State.”
Above all, Britain’s accession to the European Union Treaty of Lisbon that was signed by the EU member states on 13 December 2007, and entered into force on 1 December 2009, effectively ended Britain’s long history as a sovereign kingdom. The treaty was therefore the largest constitutional change since the signing of Magna Carta and was undertaken without the British people being formally consulted on the matter as had previously been promised by Westminster politicians prior to their election.
Additionally, there is evidence that such politicians misled the British people about the real nature and consequences of The Treaty of Lisbon yet, in spite of pro-treaty propaganda and even without formal consultation, there was widespread misgivings amongst the people who did not freely and openly give their assent to the matter or mandate the body politic to do it on their behalf. The solemn case can be made therefore that the British Monarch, Queen Elizabeth II, was constitutionally and morally bound to withhold her Royal Assent from the treaty and in not withholding that Assent was in breech of her coronation oath. Whether, as alleged by the BCG, she was “forced” to break her oath or not is irrelevant. Given such a serious breech it is therefore the lawful constitutional right of British people to remedy this matter. I believe that remedy is not only the people’s lawful right, it is a DUTY of every self-respecting British national of whatever ethnic or religious background. In such circumstances the British Constitution Group make the following further observations:
“Six British Monarchs have been deposed in one form or another, having been deselected for their failure to maintain the rights and liberties of the People. They were Ethelred, Richard II, Henry VI, Charles I (executed), James II and Edward VIII.
We have a tri-partite government in this country. Parliament, the Judiciary and the Monarchy are intended to provide protections and limits upon each other. One of those limiting powers is Royal Assent. Since Queen Anne. no British Monarch has withheld Royal Assent from an Act of Parliament. Nevertheless it remains there as the exclusive authority of the Monarch, to be used when necessary on behalf of the People. As such, several of our Sovereigns since Anne, especially the present Queen, have broken their Coronation Oath by refusing to withhold Royal Assent from unconstitutional statute. While Government is tri-partite, we the People must recognise our role in demanding our good governance. Remember what John Adams said?
… whether the crown and the people in such a case will not see the necessity of uniting in a remedy.
If we are unhappy with the manner in which we are governed, we have no right to a remedy until we are willing to act in our own defence. We must demand that our Monarch lives by the oath she took. If she does not, we must seek redress elsewhere.”
http://www.thebcgroup.org.uk/content/coronation-oath
The British people, of all ethnic or religious backgrounds have been gravely misled and betrayed, our accumulated constitutional heritage has been abused and our country is increasingly subjected to a diabolical conspiracy by tyrannical “New World Order” international plutocrats intent upon enslaving our children and grandchildren[1]. It is in the overwhelming interest of all of us, including those ‘useful idiots’ duped into assisting this conspiracy, to urgently research matters and take lawful remedy as soon as practicably possible. This is not a matter of the political right or political left, it is a matter of lawful right and wrong. The stakes could not possibly be higher for all of us and for all of our children…
“When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” [Edmund Burke, 1770, in 'Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents.'].
NOTES:
[1] For evidence on such grave and urgent matters see:
http://www.sovereignindependent.org/
http://www.ukcolumn.org/
http://themoneymasters.com/
http://www.eutruth.org.uk/
No comments:
Post a Comment