
Gary Corseri - Activist Post
Dear  William and Kate,
A  thousand apologies for this tardy response to your late-arriving  invitation!  (I  must confess, after my first question, “Why me—a  humble-as-kippers  American poet?,” my second question was: “In this era  of  girdle-tightening austerity, why the gilded note; would some churls   think that ‘bad form’?”)
The  fact is, I am rather certain this  invitation is a mistake; that it was,  in fact, meant for Gregory Corso,  a renowned “Beat” poet with whom I’ve  been confused for decades,  thanks, no doubt, to similar assonance and  consonance in our names.  If  it was so intended, that would also be a mistake, since Gregory is no  longer whinnying with us.
Frankly, I wonder why you’d bother to  invite any sort of “literary type” at all—especially a pariah type like  me?  Why  not stick with the safer bets: a Thomas Friedman, say, worth  some  $50,000,000 of married-into loot--a bloviating bloke who thinks  your  flat little world just fine?
Why me?  Did I  win some sort of lottery?  Each  day I’m deluged with news from Nigeria,  Liberia and Malaria,  congratulating me for winning billions in  lotteries I had no idea I’d  entered.  To claim my prizes, I merely must  send my birth certificate, finger prints, foot prints and certified eye  scans.  (Obama-type birth certificates will not do.)  
And now, as I  have declined the lottery invites, I must also decline your kind  invitation.   The fact is: I don’t know you.  What   I’ve seen of you on the inescapable mass media—the covers of magazines   spying on me as I check out my Raisin Bran, the flashy images on CNN ad  nauseum--quite honestly, I do not like.  William is far too toothy,  seems a bit serpentine, and Kate is too pretty to be with him--except  for all that loot!
I  mean: What did that guy do to deserve such luchre?  (What does anyone  do to “deserve” it?)  Cause,  you see, it’s getting kind of tight around  here—and where you are,  too—and a lot of us peasants are beginning to  think: there’s an inverse  proportion between money and democracy.  The  bigger the palace, the greater the malice!  
I think it was  Balzac who said, Behind every great fortune, there’s a crime.  Thomas   Paine went even further: he showed how the fortunes of the monarchies   were based on the accumulated spoils of war; or taxing peasants into   penury; outright theft from other “nobles,” and on and on.  Why grovel  before such ciminals? he wondered.  
So,  in 1776 and 1789, in 1848 and 1914,  in 1948 and 1959—in America, in  France, all over Europe, in Russia,  China, Cuba, and at other times and  in other places around this hurting  world, we’ve thrown your kind into  the sea or under the guillotines,  or stood you before firing squads—to  make you stop!  Stop the thievery,  stop the lies, stop the wars that line your bottomless pockets.  (Okay.  … Sometimes, as in Russia, we’ve gone over the top.  No need ever to  hurt  children!  If only your side felt the same way!  Because you’re  hurting children exponentially worse—all the time!)  
Every  time we  think we’re done with you, you come back like raddish  indigestion,  repeating some unpleasant taste, worse each time belched  up.
...MORE HERE...
...MORE HERE...

No comments:
Post a Comment