Wednesday, 7 November 2012

Chocolate: The "Candy" with Powerful Medicinal Properties

Sayer Ji, Contributor
Activist Post

Chocolate is clearly one of the most enjoyed foods on the planet, with millions of pounds produced annually, and has one of the oldest documented histories of use going all the way back to the year 1100 BC in South America.

And yet, many people still harbor guilt about consuming it because they associate chocolate with "candy" (which logically follows from the fact that it is in the candy section in stores where you will find it), having never been exposed to the impressive body of pre-clinical and clinical research indicating that it may actually be closer to a "medicine" than a candy.

Indeed, in a previous post, we discussed how chocolate might just give the $29 billion dollar statin drug industry a run for its money, since a 2006 study found that regular chocolate consumption may reduce cardiac mortality by 50%. And this was based on a study where subjects only consumed 2.11 grams a day, or just one half ounce a week!

Now, newer research from the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition has revealed that the consumption of chocolate, or its active constituents (cocoa, flavan-3-ols), reduces a broad range of risk factors for cardiovascular disease, some of which include insulin resistance.

The researchers looked at 42 acute and long-term studies and found a 33% median reduction in insulin resistance following chocolate consumption.

What is so unique about this new study is that chocolate consumption is generally believed to elevate blood sugar and blood insulin levels by increasing insulin resistance.


The new study not only reveals this as being a myth but sheds additional light on why chocolate consumption (especially dark, organic chocolate) may be beneficial in both the prevention and treatment of type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes. The #1 benefit involved is cocoa/chocolate's well-known ability to improve endothelial dysfunction. Elevated blood sugar leads to glycation (basically, oxidation and caramelization of blood sugars), which leads to sticky sugar-protein and sugar-lipid complexes that damage the lining of the blood vessels and other organs leading to their dysfunction. Diabetics may respond quite well to the artery-dilating effects of cocoa, and may see a reduction in morbidity and mortality as a result.

Chocolate Has 40+ Evidence-Based Health Benefits

This comes in the wake of over a decade worth of research revealing that chocolate and/or cocoa has been shown to lower blood pressure, prevents or ameliorates endothelial dysfunction (a primary contributor to atherosclerosis), protects against coronary artery disease, reduces stroke risk, prevents cholesterol oxidation (which converts healthy lipoproteins into artery-damaging ones), to name only 5 of 40+ potential health benefits associated with its regular consumption. To view the entire gamut of potential health benefits associated with consuming chocolate or cocoa-containing foods, visit our page dedicated to the topic which lists over 40 health benefits here: Chocolate Health Benefits.

Any serious discussion on the medicinal properties of chocolate should be qualified by pointing out that chocolate is often unfairly traded, and has even been linked to child enslavement. Non-organic cocoa may also contain residues of the dangerous herbicide glyphosate (the active ingredient in Roundup), among many other biocides used in conventional farming, so the consumer must take special care to avoid these moral and physiological pitfalls.

Also, many seemingly independent brands such as Dagoba or Green & Black have been bought up by super-corporations such as Hershey's and Cadbury, respectively. This means that while you think you may be eating the highest quality chocolate, it may actually be connected to less than ideal sourcing and/or trade practices. In other words, do your homework first please.

Also, because chocolate has complex pharmacologically active properties, it must be consumed in moderation, and with attention paid towards the tendency for using it to self-medicate, especially when the cocoa content is lower and the sugar content higher.

This article first appeared at GreenMedInfo.  Please visit to access their vast database of articles and the latest information in natural health.
at 11/07/2012 11:42:00 pm 0 comments
Labels:

Sunday, 4 November 2012

Top Paedophile Denies Allegations He Was A Tory

Posted by (satire)
Senior paedophile figure from Thatcher years vehemently denies allegations of ‘sickening’ right-wing activity, according to Channel 4 News
A senior paedophile is said to have rejected claims that he was involved in the systematic abuse of millions of people over a period of nearly two decades during the 80s and the 90s under the Thatcher administration.
The former child abuser – who has taken out a court injunction to prevent him being outed as a prominent Thatcherite – has “vehemently denied” what he called the “sick allegations” that he is a Tory, according to Channel 4 News.
The senior paedophile, who does not want to be named, also told The Daily Telegraph the allegations he was a Thatcherite were “totally untrue”.
He said:
During the time I was an active paedophile I never even visited a Conservative Association and if anyone publishes anything at all suggesting I am a Tory they will get a writ in the morning, I wouldn’t wait two minutes to fight such disgusting allegations.
In one of Britain’s worst ever political abuse scandals, it is alleged that millions of people across the UK – particularly miners – were physically or emotionally abused by a “powerful network of tories” with links to a former prime minister, No 10 and parliament in the all-pervading climate of abuse which existed between 1979 and 1997.
.
Related articles by Tom Pride:

Cabinet Office Shuts Up Blogs Naming High Profile Tory In Savile Scandal

MI5 vetted Savile. And decided paedophilia was nothing to worry about?

Scientists discover dim stars orbitting massive black hole at heart of BBC

BBC Denies It Was Aware Jimmy Savile Was A Northerner

BBC Panorama investigates BBC Newsnight over BBC scandal of BBC cover-up over BBC scandal

at 11/04/2012 10:14:00 am 0 comments
Labels: ,

Saturday, 3 November 2012

NEWSNIGHT; TOP POLITICAL FIGURE



Reportedly, a 'former senior political figure' was one of the top people who raped boys from Welsh children's homes.

BBC Newsnight decided not to name the man, although one abuse victim, Steven Meesham, told Newsnight he had been raped by him more than a dozen times.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2226833/Jimmy-Savile-scandal-Newsnight-claims-leading-politician-Thatcher-years-centre-widespread-paedophile-ring.html#ixzz2B6wloBah



Child abuse children's home Bryn estyn, in Wales.

Meesham said the abuse happened over many years and he was abused repeatedly in the late 1970s.

The teenager went to the police and made statements against the senior public figure.

A second anonymous victim reported the public figure to police, and provided a photo of the man.

He said: 'When I made a statement to the police the police crossed [his name] out and said there was no point.'
"Outside it was like you were sold.
"We were taken to the Crest Hotel in Wrexham, mainly on Sunday nights, where they would rent rooms."

"One particular night that I always recall is when I was basically raped, tied down, and abused by nine different men.

"You were taken by car, where basically you were sexually abused. 
"Various things would happen, drink would be involved, it was basically rape. 
"But it wasn't just him, there be other people involved as well."

When asked how many times he was abused by the politician Mr Meesham said:"More than a dozen."

Victim seeks abuse investigation - VIDEO BBC

Savile with his friend Mick Starkey, a police inspector

Meesham also said that he had gone to the police in the late 1970s to report the abuse.

"I was called a liar. I was pinned up against a wall. I could still name to this day the police officer who had done it," he said.

 "The police denied it and when they looked back, they finally admitted in the inquiry [that] statements were made. 

"That's all they would say. They wouldn't say who was named in them. But they did admit I did make a statement of sexual abuse."

Meesham insisted that his statements to the police included allegations of sexual abuse against the politician.

In 2000 another man described how as a teenager he was abused by the politician:

"We went out for something to eat and he pulled over in a layby and then, hey presto, oral sex took place."

In the early 1990s, he went to North Wales police to report the abuse, showing them faxed photographs of the senior Tory politician.

The two police officers he showed the photograph to dismissed his claims, saying that since the pictures were faxed they were not sufficiently reliable evidence and no further action was taken.

The Waterhouse inquiry looked into the child abuse in the North Wales homes.
Meesham says: "I don't understand why on Earth we had an inquiry when we had to leave out 30% of the abusers...

"I was told I couldn't go into detail about these people, I couldn't name them and they wouldn't question me on them."

Sir Jimmy Savile in Belfast, site of the Kincora children's home, said to have been used by MI5.
Reportedly, "The magazine alleged that the peer referred to in the article is Lord..... at the time of the offences ....... of the governing Conservative Party. 

Another regular participant in the activities at Bryn Clwyd was alleged by Scallywag to be D....... for years a leading mover and shaker in successive Conservative administrations.

"Scallywag alleged that D..... was a sadist with an abnormally large penis, who was particularly violent and without mercy in his treatment of the boys. The magazine alleged that on regular occasions his victims would end up in casualty wards. He was a leading political fixer and adviser to Margaret Thatcher....

"The former children connected with this empire of evil who died in mysterious circumstances may have been murdered by the British security services, the price of their silence their lives."

On 1 December 1991, the Independent on Sunday referred to former Police Superintendent Gordon Anglesea and children's home Bryn Estyn in Wales 
(Chief Superintendent Gordon Anglesea.):

"According to former residents at Bryn Estyn, Gordon Anglesea, a former senior North Wales police officer, was a regular visitor there.

"He recently retired suddenly without explanation.

"Another serving officer has been accused of assaulting a child at Ty'r Felin."
BRITTEN; HEMMINGS; KRAYS; MI5; BBC
MYSTERIOUS DEREK LAUD
Posted by at
Labels: , , ,

8 comments:

Anonymous said...
I have been following this story with great interest, i am an old man with many past connections
and this has gone on a long time,
winston churchillwas an abuser of boys, does that shock people ? his was a marriage of convenience
a horrible man in the extreme
another man with close connections to the queen and the art world i know for an absolute fact had many boys murdered, most of these were from childrens homes, orphans who were said to have been transferred to other home andthen just disappeared, stephenn ward tried to protect them, and told me shocking big names were involved
3:33 AM
tony roma said...
AANGIRFAN
your work here is quite amazing keep going one of the real true voices in a sea of fake forum smoke and mirrors.
whoever is running the mega david ike savile page is baning hacking and deleting information 24 7.
a complete scandal many of the load voices have been silenced.
around the time of the tom watson prime ministers question time fake question ikes forum went weird and has been hoovered up ever since.
the mods are controlled scum.
the information control is rock solid keep going and keep safe.
5:20 AM
Anon said...
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "NEWSNIGHT; TOP POLITICAL FIGURE":

xxxx is the canary in the coalmine, far more than xxxxxxxx or even the likes of xxxxxx.

xxxx is by no means the only one involved in the most depraved child abuse and murder imaginable; there are dozens just among household names, but xxxx is a weak link because he is highly mentally unstable and not especially bright - except in an animalistic sense.

Savile was a genius. xxxx is anything but.

Also look at xxxxs' links and they are a similar pattern to Savile though - very senior politicans and media figures.

xxxx has also been involved personally in a very sloppy and public murder which once looked at in any detail will reveal all.
7:36 AM
Anonymous said...
I wonder if Tom Watson is trying to embarrass Cameron, who worked with the ring in the Conservative Research Dept.

[Samantha's father was also close to Laud, who is said to have paid for Cameron to visit S. Africa, which may also have been the trip related to the missing nuclear weapons saga.]

Twitter will bring wider discussion of Ore, Kincora. etc and the entire establishment being tarnished. Is it a turf war or a long-term 5th column attack by a foreign intel agency?!
9:42 AM
Anonymous said...
Sanctimonious crap from Dimbleby - "Paedophilia is a huge national problem that no one thought about 50 years ago and is now something that concerns everyone, but this has become a witchhunt against the BBC." (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20190426)

50 years ago the secret services spent 90% of their time cataloguing sexual antics, particularly homosexuality and paedophilia, and particularly amongst public figures. The intelligence services thought 1960s Britain was a cauldron of suspicious communist sympathisers ready to fall prey to blackmail. The tabloids endlessly catalogued the spy rings, politicians, public toilets and little boys.

Perhaps the head of MI5, Jonathan Evans, recalls his time in Sevenoaks School, another school were boys were sexually abused by adults? Does he perhaps recall any of the current "senior politicians" being regular visitors? Was it also a "paedophile sweet shop"? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Evans_%28MI5_officer%29)
11:06 AM
Anonymous said...
Anon 3.33 AM.

Hi. Been researching Stephen Ward (as has Aangirfan) lots of disinformation, most are dead now, but there are whispers out there. It does seem Ward was into various shady-dealings, but was a loyal and honest man working for his country, MI5 and CIA, and, incensed by the child-abuse he uncovered was investigating masonic/paedophile networks. Certain police were involved, knowing of it but no proof to act on. Ward was in reality nothing like what the press said.

Both the leading girls involved are alive (can't trace the others) but not talking. Did get in touch with one but she suddenly went silent when she realised what I was into (what else? Collecting stamps?) Another who has own website tried, she was a topic written about so she did talk, enough to clarify certain details but nothing worth bothering about. Again went silent.

I'm trying to piece together the truth.

Any chance you might share memories of Ward?

One thing: Rumour has it Ward had a son, a teen at the time of the scandal. Info (from black magick sources) gave the name 'Sven'. But these people are reticent to embellish on that. Apart from these whispers there's no detail out there. Any comments?
11:10 AM
Anonymous said...
Police first dropped charges in 1958.

"I have no recollection of ever having met Jimmy Savile and no recollection of these events." ... "The [department is] rightly now investigating to establish the facts."

http://www.smh.com.au/world/police-dropped-charges-against-savile-in-1958-20121014-27ky7.html
11:20 AM
Anonymous said...
Lord McAlpine's Wikipedia entry has been largely removed and then edit-protected since Newsnight's senior Tory paedophile episode. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alistair_McAlpine,_Baron_McAlpine_of_West_Green

Talk page:

Given what's currently brewing on Twitter regarding the supposed Newsnight report tonight, it might be an idea to protect this page... 20:09, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Are you suggesting that Lord McAlpine is a paedophile? 23:02, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Couldn't possibly comment in the paedo accusations, but McAlpine built Dinorwig Power Station in North Wales, not that I'm saying it would have given him an excuse to visit the area! 00:00, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

(Construction of Dinorwig began in 1974 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinorwig_Power_Station)
12:21 PM
at 11/03/2012 05:07:00 am 0 comments
Labels: ,

Sunday, 28 October 2012

Her Majesty's BBC Saville Cesspit - MI5 'll Fix It





BBC Saville Cesspit Guarded by Her Majesty's MI5 
For more than fifty years the BBC denied, that secret service vetting was taking place. Broadcast unions, constantly raised the issue. The BBC denied it both formally and informally. Alasdair Milne then Director-General, said, "I cannot believe this is true, just seven months later, he was forced to admit it, 'It is one of those things one knew about, felt a bit grubby about. I think most of us did but didn't tackle it as radically as we should have done." Like the issue of paedophillia today, this is still the odious culture of the BBC today.

 After newspaper disclosures in August 1985, the BBC finally confirmed, the secret service political vetting system of its staff. MI5's recommendation's are final. The BBC were so secretive on political vetting, to the extent of not telling even their own chairperson, Stuart Young until early 1985 ? Apart from the embarrassment of having to admit, clandestine vetting, the answer lies in the peculiar status of the corporation and the considerable numbers of its pedophile employees. 

 The whispers of a child sex scandal centred on Jimmy Savile, it's entertainment anchorman were around for over thirty years. Information surfaced that Jimmy Savile was a full member of  Paedophile Information Exchange (P.I.E) an organisation which campaigning for the abolition of the age of sexual consent in the UK.

 The BBC's relationship with the British state and Her Majesty, was outlined in a memorandum of the 1971 Franks Commission on the Official Secrets Act. The official view is that the Governors of the BBC, are persons holding office under Her Majesty, as per the meaning of Section 2 of the 1911 Official Secrets Act, that the Director-General and his staff ,are people employed under persons who hold such office.

 This ruling clearly bound BBC staff as being employed by persons holding office under Her Majesty and thus in possession of secret information. Hence their special relationship and obligations to the British State. It was on this pretext that political vetting by MI5 was introduced and preserved with secrecy. The BBC do not view themselves a State servants: Their staff's legal status is neither that of civil servants nor that of  those employed by a commercial organisation.

 A letter was been sent to Lord Patten, Chairman of the BBC, quite few years ago, stating "I am placing this information before you in this open letter as I feel that the BBC should now initiate a full investigation into these reports suggesting that during the 1970’s and early 1980’s the BBC’s editorial policy was influenced in favour of P.I.E. This alleged infiltration of the BBC by P.I.E in large numbers, might also explain how Savile was able to operate as a sexual predator for his extended tenure at the BBC without challenge or prosecution.Neither could it be possible in such large numbers for such an extended period without the dark hand of MI5.
Stuart Hood believed if the BBC was honest, it would admit that it must support central political authority of the Queen by virtue of the Her Majesty's licence-fee system. But like their paedophiles, the Corporation has always had fantasies of grandeur about itself as a social organisation beyond accountability. It also with the help of MI5, prevented investigation or prosecution as the writer of the of the following letter was to discover along time ago. "I will pursue my objective of securing a full investigation into the alleged membership of Jimmy Savile of the organisation, P.I.E. I will also continue to seek a full and open investigation of the influence, if any, that P.I.E exerted on BBC editorial policy during the 1970's and 1980's. I also expect the authorities to investigate whether any BBC employees were members of P.I.E or expressed sympathy and support for the aims and objectives of P.I.E." Sadly he was foiled and frustrated.

 Margaret Thatcher who had a considerable number of paedophiles in her Tory Cabinet as well as the BBC, once threatened to "veto" a BBC Panorama programme about MI5 and MI6 because it was going to reveal details about the way they operate and questioned their total lack of public accountability. In a  "top secret and personal" letter, cabinet secretary, Sir Robert Armstrong, recommended that Margaret Thatcher invoke rarely used powers to silence them.

 Today Britain's Secret Services, MI5 and MI6 are demanding changes to the UK's justice system, with secret service courts to intern any member of the public without trial, such as whistle blowers on paedophiles or those with liberal politics. MI5, still secretly controls the hiring and firing of BBC staff. For example they blocked the appointment of an editor of The Listener. MI5 originally operated, unknown to almost all BBC staff, from Room 105, an out-of-the way office, on the first floor of Broadcasting House, on which George Orwell modelled his ' Ministry of Truth in 'Nineteen Eighty-Four.' Behind that door sat Brigadier Ronnie Stonham, 'Sp.A. to D.Pers.' As assistant to Christopher Martin, with a team of three female assistants, he liaised with MI5.
BBC staff applying for promotion needed MI5 approval, with their continuous political surveillance on everyone, including directors, film editors, actors and people such as Jimmy Savile. Some had their files stamped with a symbol, like a Christmas tree. Meaning a second, secret file held in Room 105. Intimate personal details containing purported 'security' information, collected by secret agents which in reality was political. A staff member may be shortlisted the second file, a buff folder with a round red sticker and the sign 'secret,' given to the department head, to sign for it.

 Concealed from the individuals concerned, who have no clue about what is being used against them, similar to the secret courts to sentence people to long term of internment, similar to Marian Price in British Occupied Ireland.Their details are fed into a computer containing the details of millions of British 'subversives' ?. When MI5 regards a person as a 'security risk' or politically incorrect, it is enough to blacklist him or her for life. A bizarre aspect, is that BBC boards, are expressly forbidden to ask openly about political views at interview, while it is a priority in secret. Senior executives are fearful of speaking out about vetting, because of the Official Secrets Act, with  victims of blacklisting, generally too scared to admit it. neither can they speak about the numerous MI5 paedophile proteges within the BBC.
Sir Hugh Greene a former director-general, said: 'In my day we would never have allowed jobs like The Listener to go to MI5.' Then MI5's claims were challenged, they were often at best, over-zealous and at worst ,false information against applicants, for political spite or to leave the door open for an MI5 paedophile protege. An example of MI5 blacklisting of potential BBC personnel at its most sinister, was in 1981, when a board considered whom to appoint editor of the BBC's Listener. Richard Gott the Guardian's features editor,  with a brilliant presentation was chosen.

 However, MI5 disapproved. 'His file went off for "colleging," the secret BBC term for MI5 vetting and it was blocked. They said he was politically unsuitable Their phrase "He digs with the wrong foot" being the same terms, used for a Catholic seeking employment witha boss from the Orange Order In British Occupied Ireland. So, what do the BBC and MI5 achieve from their secret black- balling ? The reasons for this clumsy, dishonest and very unfair system can only be PIE whose key aim was to secure a reduction of the age of consent in the UK to FIVE and then abolish it altogether. Within the BBC they became creators in public discourse with programmes such as Hearts and Minds, grooming public political opinion for MI5 with even their own programmes such as Spooks. 

 The Paedophile organisation secured significant support within Her Majesty's parliament, the entertainment industry, the media and similar, professional, organisations. It was reported that the organisation's membership list was found to contain the names of nationally known politicians, entertainers and people engaged in professions, including the medical and legal profession. The influential nature of its membership and the extent of support in places like the BBC among ‘opinion formers’ probably explains how it managed to remain in existence in Britain for so long. Independent investigations indicate clearly that the tentacles of P.I.E extended deep in the British establishment as well as the BBC and Parliament.
In October 2004, stories were published implying the BBC Director General had suggested that the dumbing down of the BBC was the consequence of its growing number of female executives: "Too many dumb, dumb, dumb cookery and gardening shows . . . I have nothing against women. I've worked with them all my life. It just seems to me that the television service has largely been run by women for the last four to five years and they don't seem to have done a great job of work." 

 The system where all staff were politically vetted by the Secret Services and their decision given in writing without anyreasons for their recommendations was enough to blacklist him or her permanently. Members of board interviews were told not to ask questions. For many years a BBC staff member was used as MI5 Liaison Officer but in 1982 Brigadier Ronald Stonham, moved into Room 105 along with the  Director of Personnel, Christopher Martin. In 1985. The BBC stated, "Only relatively few members of staff go through this [vetting] procedure. They are necessarily involved in sensitive areas or require access to classified information.' 
They are liars. Considerable evidence shows that vetting was used in a political context, not for security reasons.
Whitehall euphemisms for vetting became standard during post-interview discussions. 'Does he play with a straight bat?' or 'Does he have snow on the right foot?' typical BBC expressions for political suitability that can be found on the streets of loyalist sectarian Belfast. Politics and sexual orientation rather than security were much more relevant. MI5 reserve their strongest objections to BBC drama producers. Television drama reflects the latest radical mood with hard-hitting, naturalistic dramas which portray working-class people in a sympathetic light who might with affirmation challenge the whole paedophile British class sytsem, sparked off political controversy such as recent Jimmy Savile controversy. Drama has a powerful hold on peoples hearts and minds and a source of political influence much safer then to have MI5 programmes like Spooks in place. 

 One applications as a film editor on a six-month attachment to the BBC Community Programmes Unit was unsuccessful. A senior executive sitting on the interview board, explained why. The applicant was interviewed but as soon as he left the room, MI5 said there had been a mistake. His file had a Christmas tree, meaning a security file was because of something to do with sympathies for Welsh nationalism. He didn't get the job. His Welsh nationalist activities amounted to learning the Welsh language, because he was working on programmes of Welsh interest. This is also true for applicants with Scottish or Irish sympathies.
Many sources spoke of Savile’s membership of P.I.E which was known to many others within the BBC, who were either sympathetic or were members themselves. There was no effective pursuit of Savile, his friends in the BBC or the organisation, by either MI5 or the BBC, during the many years of P.I.E’s existence. Contrasted against their thorough vetting of BBC staff, with liberal thoughts or politics, there can be but one conclusion on the generic nature and extent of BBC/MI5 paedophile patronage. Savile must have been vetted by MI5. Savile was known, by many of his contacts, to be a child sex abuser for over 50 years. Savile was a procurer for royalty and the wealthy. Savile was a protected man. This cesspit, is at the core of the British ruling class, protected by both MI5 and the BBC, they are filth.
at 10/28/2012 02:11:00 am 0 comments
Labels: ,

Friday, 26 October 2012

Savile a cornerstone of the establishment

Hi Tap, I thought it was it is time to move on from SAVILE, & look at the Deeper Implications, & show just how widespread this Paedophilic Practice is , & the Extent to which it is accepted as Normal Behaviour in the Elitist Circles. It appears to underpin much of Recent History, & explains much, & why those who should have been removed from Public Office, just end up with getting their Wrists Slapped, & sometimes not even that. Those in Authority who do address the issue, & seek to investigate claims, get Tared & Feathered, by The Elite Parasites who seek to stop such Investigations. BUT NOW I AM NOT SO SURE WE CAN MOVE AWAY FROM SAVILE, HE APPEARED TO BE A CORNER STONE OF THE ESTABLISHMENT. It is well known that he vas vetted by The Intelligence Services, who it appears didn't want to loose him. He always struck me as a Complete Arse'ole quite frankly, but he was in an Industry that could exercise tremendous leverage over the record buying teenagers, as well as Culturally  Influencing them. Had he not been so important they would have OUTED HIM. was this due to His GANGSTER & IRA CONTACTS. He would also have been a Key Informant, in his roll of Supplier, in Keeping Tabs on The Users. This information would have been very important, to keep them under control.

The Savile Affair is gathering a Momentum all of its own, which will as I predicted produce a Monumental Avalanche, when That 'Butterfly Gets out of Control' It is only through Alternative media that this Information ever saw the 'Light of Day', it was only then after Blogs spread this information that the Main & Controlled Media  had to follow suit, with still The BBC dragging it's heels, & a great reluctance to admit anything. We will see Major Heads Roll, when The Rats Start Leaving The Sinking Ship. As you have rightly pointed out Tap. I am of the opinion that RANTZEN, is Highly Implicated, by Association, as Savile was not the type to keep his mouth shut was he?
If Clark was responsible for allowing Savile to have The Keys Of BROADMOOR SECURITY HOSPITAL, (and if he wasn't more serious questions need to be asked), then THATCHER will be Involved by Association also, not only via Clark, but through Savile who was a Personal Friend of hers, as it is doubtful he would have kept his Big Mouth shut on such an Issue. It also appears he was a Friend of The Krays, he had links with The IRA, associated with TOP COPS. He was also on Friendly Terms with Boothby, Driberg & Many Other Deviants.

TAP -  MPs are begging the BBC to make this all go away.  It's much bigger than the BBC.  Cameron's response is minimal as he knows the scandal has legs and could overwhelm his government.
The Sunday People reveals how Savile once told one of their journalists that he could fix anyone with just one phone call – to the IRA terrorists.

Savile said: "All I have to do is call my friends in the IRA. They’ll have someone waking up in hospital the next morning eating their breakfast through a f***ing straw
CAMERON, & ANYONE WHO SUPPORTS THESE SLIMY PERVERTERS, & PURVEYORS  OF JUSTICE WILL BE PUTTING THEIR 'BALLS ON THE BLOCK' IN NO UNCERTAIN MANNER, ALSO NOW IS THE TIME TO ASK SOME VERY PERTINENT QUESTIONS ABOUT THE BBC, & THE POWER THEY HAVE BEEN GIVEN. 
THEY DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT, TO SET A PENALTY FOR NON COMPLIANCE OVER LICENSING. AS WAS POINTED OUT IN THE BLOG, SEVERAL WEEKS AGO. THIS IS IN BREACH OF COMMON LAW. 
WE SHOULD BE ASKING, WHAT RIGHT HAVE THEY TO CHARGE ANY LICENSE  FEE AT ALL, OR SHOULD THEY EVEN BE ALLOWED TO EXIST IN THEIR PRESENT FORM AS THEY ARE NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE.
It appears the only thing Savile hasn't done is to Commit Murder, though with the Villains he associated with he could well have arranged Contracts on those he wanted removed for causing him problems. No doubt in the forthcoming weeks we wi;ll be enlightened on this issue.

 REGARDS.............WASP
at 10/26/2012 02:02:00 am 0 comments
Labels: ,

Tuesday, 23 October 2012

NJ “Weedman” found not guilty in jury nullification victory

Image source
JG Vibes
Activist Post

With few options left for people to protect themselves from the ever growing police state, an old and long forgotten aspect of constitutional law is making a huge comeback, and becoming very popular in cases where people are facing jail time for nonviolent offenses.

This reemerging defense is the act of jury nullification, which is basically the right for any juror to not only judge the facts of the case, but to also actually judge the validity of the law itself. This means that if a jury feels that a defendant is facing an unjust charge they actually have the right to rule in their favor even if they are technically guilty.

Ed Forchion is a medical cannabis user and cancer patient known as the “NJ weedman”. Ed claims dual residency in Pemberton Township, New Jersey and Los Angeles, California. Due to his residency in California he has a prescription for Cannabis and is legally allowed to grow and consume the plant in that state.

However, he is not legally allowed to possess the plant in the state of New Jersey and unfortunately while in New Jersey on April 1, 2012 Forchion was stopped by police and found with a pound of cannabis and $2,000, enough to get slapped with a distribution charge.

At an earlier trial last spring, he was convicted of possession, but that jury could not reach a unanimous decision on the more serious distribution charge, leading to this week’s retrial. With the distribution charge he was facing 10 years, and it is likely that the jury couldn’t send him away with a clear conscience. Ed’s primary strategy throughout his whole ordeal has been jury nullification, much to the dismay of Superior Court Judge Charles Delehey, who presided over both trials.


Forchion was passionate in his closing arguments, wearing a shirt that said “Marijuana … It’s OK. It’s Just Illegal” and telling the jury that he had been munching on pot cookies throughout the whole trial. Then at one point he was nearly held in contempt of court for trying to advance his jury nullification argument.

Considering the fact that most of the nonviolent offenses on the books today are extremely unpopular for a variety of reasons, you would think that jury nullification would be household knowledge, or taught in schools even. However, this is a very well guarded secrets, with many judges actually preventing the defense from informing juries of their right to nullify laws that they feel are unjust.

When Forcion started to talk about nullification, Delehey quickly stopped him, reminding him that he wasn’t allowed to go there, but Forchion fought back with intelligence and intensity. Frustrated, the judge ordered the jury out of the room and told him he would be held in contempt if he continued to speak the truth.

According to Phillyblurbs the judge told him “If you want to make a martyr of yourself, the court will deal with you. You’ve done everything you can to disrupt this trial.”

There has been a constant tug of war between the defendant and the judge for the past year. During last May’s trial, Forchion and his supporter’s placed pamphlets about jury nullification on cars parked in the jury parking lot and were very vocal about the illegitimacy of the law and the juries right to decide the validity of the law.

In pretrial motions, which were subsequently barred from being argued before the jury, Forchion challenged the constitutionality of the state’s criminal code now that New Jersey has a Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana law that recognizes the benefits of cannabis.

He said Thursday he looks forward to the state Appellate Division reviewing that motion when he appeals the possession conviction, which he still faces sentencing on. Oddly enough, it will be the same judge who decides his sentence, but he will still have the ability to appeal, which can possibly lead to another acquittal.

J.G. Vibes is the author of an 87 chapter counter culture textbook called Alchemy of the Modern Renaissance and host of a show called Voluntary Hippie Radio. He is also an artist with an established record label and event promotion company that hosts politically charged electronic dance music events. You can keep up with his work, which includes free podcasts, free e-books & free audiobooks at his website www.aotmr.com.
at 10/23/2012 10:38:00 am 0 comments
Labels:

Saturday, 20 October 2012

Scientists: Creativity Part of ‘Mental Illness’

Anthony Gucciardi
Activist Post

If you like to express yourself through painting, writing, or any other form of artistic action, scientists now say that you must be suffering from a mental illness of some kind. In a new display of how truly insane the mainstream medical health paradigm has become, mainstream media outlets are now regurgitating the words of ‘experts’ who say that those who are creative are actually, more often than not, mentally ill.

After all, more than 50% of the United States is, by definition of the psychiatrists of the nation, mentally ill. Even questioning the government is considered a mental disorder. It should come as no surprise to know that upwards of 70% of the psychiatrists who write the conditions are — of course — on the payroll of those who produce the drugs to ‘treat’ the conditions. It should also therefore come as no surprise to note that the DSM (the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, which is the foundation of the entire diagnosis system) now contains over 900 pages of bogus disorders.

And perhaps creativity may soon be added to the massive textbook, which labels people who are shy, eccentric, or have unconventional romantic lives as mentally ill.

Is it any wonder that the 4th edition of the manual, which added hundreds of new ways to diagnose patients, led to a 40 times increase in bipolar disorder diagnoses. Even the lead editor of the DSM-IV Allen Frances, MD, has stated the book is utter nonsense:
There is no definition of a mental disorder. It’s bull****. I mean, you just can’t define it, he said.
Real information like this is what has led the mainstream news to re-title their pieces regarding the new classification of creativity as a mental illness, changing the headlines to more ‘ginger’ ways of linking the two together. Meanwhile, the writers of the study claiming that creativity is part of a mental illness are quite clear in stating that creativity is literally a mental illness. The extent in which you wish to ‘treat’ your creativity, however, is apparently up to you and your doctor.


Be of caution, however, as you have to decide at ‘what cost’ you will allow your creativity to exist. As the study writer stated:
If one takes the view that certain phenomena associated with the patient’s illness are beneficial, it opens the way for a new approach to treatment. In that case, the doctor and patient must come to an agreement on what is to be treated, and at what cost.
As expected the way to ‘treat’ your creativity is of course to take pharmaceutical drugs in the form of anti-depressants or hardcore psychotropic drugs. The same drugs that virtually all suicidal massacre shooters have taken before or during their rampages.

As virtually everything we think and do is classified as a symptom of a mental disorder, the mainstream psychiatric paradigm will continue to grow like a massive parasite alongside the pharmaceutical industry that profits off of the absolute laughable diagnoses of regular adults, children, and even toddlers. Until we realize that we need to shift into a new health paradigm that is centered around personal health freedom and shed corporate science as a whole, we will continue to see insane headlines classifying thought and emotion as mental illness.

Explore More:


This article first appeared at Natural Society, an excellent resource for health news and vaccine information.
at 10/20/2012 04:07:00 am 0 comments
Labels: , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)